User talk:Aleenf1/Archive 8

This is an archive of past discussions about User:Aleenf1. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.

Archive 5

Archive 6

Archive 7

→

Kobayashi

You will need a source to say that Kobayashi has failed to qualify before you can put it in the article. Not passing the 107% time is not proof of a DNQ. No driver has ever DNQ'd under these circumstances and this will be no different, so leave it in until any announcement is made of a DNQ. Trust me, it won't happen. Bretonbanquet (talk) 12:45, 7 May 2011 (UTC)

You are adding information, i.e. that Kobayashi has failed to qualify, without a source. You are also very close to WP:3RR, and you are not discussing either. I may report you if you continue. Bretonbanquet (talk) 12:53, 7 May 2011 (UTC)

You need a specific source to match the information you are adding, i.e. that Kobayashi has failed to qualify for the Turkish Grand Prix. You are adding unsourced contentious material that violates the policy on biographies of living persons (BLP). If you want to add that he needs steward's confirmation that he is allowed to race, then do so. But you cannot add that he has DNQd because no source says it anywhere. None of GP.com, Autosport, FORIX and F1.com say that he has DNQ'd. We can't say he has failed to qualify because that decision has not been made. I am not saying he has been allowed to race, I am saying he has not DNQ'd. Of course I'm not a steward, don't be facetious. And you know he'll be allowed to race anyway, so why add false information, actually false, unsourced information? In the extremely unlikely event that the steward's disqualify him, we can add it when it happens. Bretonbanquet (talk) 13:13, 7 May 2011 (UTC)

The Australian GP is entirely different. You need a source to say Kobayashi has DNQ'd for this race. Bretonbanquet (talk) 13:14, 7 May 2011 (UTC)

As I said before, I was not saying that Kobayashi was allowed to race. I merely placed him 24th in qualifying, which was where he was classified. There's no OR in that, I could have sourced it four times over. You said he had DNQ'd which was unsourced OR, later proven to be incorrect, as we both knew it would be. Anyway, as you say, no sense in arguing about it now. Thanks for your comments on the other guy. Bretonbanquet (talk) 23:53, 7 May 2011 (UTC)

Hockey World Cup

There is an existence of many "Hockey world cups", including the more popular ice hockey world cup. Although that is called the World cup of Hockey. However, with many named similarly I think we should name it "field" or "ice" so their isn't any confusion. Intoronto1125TalkContributions 04:26, 8 May 2011 (UTC)

???

Um... Hey I received a vadilism message about an article called Doctor Octopus. I did not contribute to this page, as I do not want to EVEN contribute to this article at all. I have no idea why I got this. GirlsAlouud (talk · contribs} 05:15, 28 May 2011 (UTC)

Oah, ok, thanks for telling me, sorry for the bad message, just didn't know. Thanks :) GirlsAlouud (talk · contribs} 04:42, 29 May 2011 (UTC)

Template:Hockeybox

Hi you nominated [[:Template:Hockeybox]] for speedy delete G6 but did not give a reason. You are free to nominate it again with a reason to delete. Or G6 with a reason to dlete such as you want to move something else there. Perhaps T3 unused template. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 12:22, 17 May 2011 (UTC)

Pérez

Ouch. But, apparently he's OK ("concious and talking").

I just saw you update the article, so guess you're watching? Chzz ► 13:14, 28 May 2011 (UTC)

Template help

Hello. I have noticed you edited {{Infobox Grand Prix race report}}, which is fairly similar to NASCAR's version {{NASCAR race season infobox}}. However, on the NASCAR race report articles the second part of the team name is not shown on the same line as the drivers name, while the Grand Prix infobox is someone coded some other way. Could you please try to fix the problem? Thanks. --Nascar1996 (talk • contribs) 19:25, 28 May 2011 (UTC)

Thank you for fixing it. I think the template looks better now. --Nascar1996 (talk • contribs) 04:20, 29 May 2011 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:2006 WWC field hockey.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:2006 WWC field hockey.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 09:07, 7 June 2011 (UTC)

2010 Asian Games

Hello Aleenf1, I think it's my obligation to personally give you my congratulations for the 2010 Asian Games, which has just passed the GA review, and really whole credit goes to you. — Bill william compton^Talk 23:19, 12 June 2011 (UTC)

Broadcasting

I noticed that you created the article for the 2012 Summer Olympics broadcasters, would you like to make the article for the 2011 Pan American Games? Intoronto1125TalkContributions 04:37, 13 June 2011 (UTC)

Limited as in what? I think you would be able to do a great job. Intoronto1125TalkContributions 05:02, 13 June 2011 (UTC)

I understand, however as the games draw closer more should be known. Intoronto1125TalkContributions 14:22, 13 June 2011 (UTC)

I think an article should be made if the list gets to long. With 41 countries it probably will. Intoronto1125 TalkContributions 15:47, 15 June 2011 (UTC)

Liverpool F.C. wiki

Hello, I am the lead sysop on the Liverpool F.C. wiki. It is a wiki dedicated solely to Liverpool F.C.. We aim to make the ultimate database for the club we all love. Since adopting the incredibly inactive wiki about a month ago we have greatly increased the article count and modernized it from it's previous state. The problem is there are not many active members on the site and we need more for the site to properly grow. It is well organized and on it's way to be a great site we just need more editors to expand. It is based on Wikia's network of wikis. Like Wikipedia it is free to use and the editing process is exactly the same. If you know how to edit Wikipedia you will know how to edit the Liverpool F.C. wiki. Now for the question you may be asking yourself. Why edit there? Wikipedia has articles on Liverpool. This is true. At the Liverpool wiki it is all about Liverpool. We allow editors to edit anything about Liverpool no matter how trivial. We allow edits on reserve and academy players, and even things as trivial as the fitness coaches for the year 2011. We also do not lock pages to registered users. That means if you have something to say about Steven Gerrard you can click edit and not view source and actually write something. I would love for you to come by and check the wiki out. Feel free to edit any page. Every time you click edit your ARE helping this wiki grow. Thanks for taking the time to read this! http://liverpoolfc.wikia.com/wiki/Liverpool_FC_Wiki --Coffeeclub213 (talk) 02:00, 14 June 2011 (UTC)

Request related to badminton article

Hi Aleenf1, I made an article India at the 2011 Sudirman Cup, which is fully sourced with all necessary information, but lacks some structured language as I'm completely unaware of badminton's terminologies. As you are pretty much active on sports and badminton related articles, so would you please rewrite the article with the better terminologies. It will be really helpful in the development of this article, thanks and regards. — Bill william compton^Talk 18:26, 17 June 2011 (UTC)

Infobox NASCAR race report

Hello, I remember that you helped me fix a problem with the above template. If you can I would appreciate it if you can remove the dash from under the distance. It appeared, and I can't remove it. Thanks, -- Nascar1996^{(Talk • Contribs)} 01:49, 8 July 2011 (UTC)

Thank you. -- Nascar1996^{(Talk • Contribs)} 14:28, 8 July 2011 (UTC)

July 2011

Could you please stop reverting my edits. There is a source to it and you are just saying it. Thanks. Qantasplanes (Talk with me) 12:18, 14 July 2011 (UTC)

Logo

Hey, why did you changed it to .png? There is no difference and the text is clearer to read at "my" format... Kante4 (talk) 14:17, 14 August 2011 (UTC)

Sorry, size difference, encouraging by guidelines. --Aleen f1 14:40, 14 August 2011 (UTC)

Torch relay map

I noticed you created the 2010 Asian Games torch relay map [1]. Would you be able to create the torch relay map for the 2011 Pan American Games? The route is located here: 2011 Pan American Games torch relay. Thanks. Intoronto1125 TalkContributions 04:31, 29 August 2011 (UTC)

I will, soon. --Aleen f1 06:41, 29 August 2011 (UTC)

Sounds great thanks! Intoronto1125 TalkContributions 13:21, 29 August 2011 (UTC)

Take all the time you need, it is isn't urgent at all. Thanks! Intoronto1125 TalkContributions 14:04, 30 August 2011 (UTC)

Looks great! Thank you. Intoronto1125 TalkContributions 14:54, 1 September 2011 (UTC)

October 2011

Hi Aleenf1. Thank you for your work on patrolling new pages and tagging for speedy deletion. I'm just letting you know that I declined your deletion request for a page that you tagged for speedy deletion, because the criterion you used or the reason you gave does not cover this kind of page. Please take a moment to look at the suggested tasks for patrollers and review the criteria for speedy deletion. Particularly, the section covering non-criteria. Such pages are best tagged with proposed deletion, proposed deletion for biographies of living persons, or sent to the appropriate deletion discussion. Please could you stop spamming speedy deletions? Thank you.. DARKSHADOWMIST (talk) 15:15, 14 October 2011 (UTC)

Thank you for your work on tagging talk pages with no corresponding articles for speedy deletion. You are totally right to do so. I have deleted some of them, but I have no more time now. I hope the others will be deleted by other administrators. JamesBWatson (talk) 15:36, 14 October 2011 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

	The Tireless Contributor Barnstar
	For constantly weeding out orphaned talk pages, you make our jobs as admins a lot easier. Alexandria (talk) 15:40, 24 October 2011 (UTC)

Thank you! --Aleen f1 12:14, 25 October 2011 (UTC)

Removing copyrighted material from where?

This edit states that copyrighted material was removed but you don't indicate where the material was originally taken from. Could you please take a moment to add that information to the article's talk page? --Walter Görlitz (talk) 14:04, 3 November 2011 (UTC)

Lin Dan

Please refrain from blanket removal of content, as per Wikipedia rules! If you have problems with an article please move to the Discussion forum on that article! Your continual biased editing towards this topic is unhealthy and unreliable for the article! 61.9.142.251 (talk) 00:33, 4 November 2011 (UTC)

BWF Grand Prix Gold and Grand Prix 2009, 2010

Hi Aleenf1, do you think, that the continental championships belonged in 2009 and 2010 still to the Grand Prix? I can't find any information about that. See for instance [2], [3], but: [4]. Best Florentyna (talk) 12:48, 8 November 2011 (UTC)

Previously it was presented at the calendar but now gone, anyway think present rather than past, maybe you can delete from article because it is no longer present as part of it. --Aleen f1 12:58, 8 November 2011 (UTC)

Football at the All-Africa Games

If I understand your meaning you talk about the Summaries's (men & women) table, however you changes all the page. Why ? --Faycal.09 (talk) 08:14, 13 November 2011 (UTC)

stop the destruction of the page plz, I gives exactly the same pattern of Football at the Summer Olympics. Also in the page that you put there are some errors. --Faycal.09 (talk) 16:35, 14 November 2011 (UTC)

Ok we suppose that u right, however u must correct many mistakes in the page, and also we must change many pages of football competitions like Football at the Summer Olympics, Football at the Asian Games, FIFA World Cup, Africa Cup of Nations, UEFA European Football Championship...etc, are u right with me? or we must change only Football at the All-Africa Games? --Faycal.09 (talk) 17:28, 14 November 2011 (UTC)

I do not know why you insisted to change only this Page!!! In the version that you put, Tables of summaries are old and contain mistakes. You also deleted some important informations such as the medal tables. I took exactly the same model of Football at the Summer Olympics and I changed some informations as you had wanted. I am not your enemy, on the contrary we should be friends and work together. Be clear and think carefully about what we do. Please don't change, There are two changes that were made by you and me in the present article. Greetings. --Faycal.09 (talk) 09:04, 20 November 2011 (UTC)

I propose, to correct the page without changing all, the tables of summaries are more recent i think u agree that. u can change what is not conform. I think also that we don't need to move medal tables, there are more complete. Greetings. --Faycal.09 (talk) 09:48, 20 November 2011 (UTC)

I don't know if I understand your meaning, however please correct the summeries if u want but don't revert them. In the men table, we don't need to put the postponed edition in Bamako 1969, and the next edition of 2015 will held in Brazzaville not in Accra. Greetings. --Faycal.09 (talk) 10:14, 20 November 2011 (UTC)

Yes I saw that, thank u for your message. the 1969 edition was postponed and not exist. we can see this information in the general table of the different edition in All-Africa Games article, however it's not necessary to put this information in football table cause all the 1969 games were postponed not only football game.

Other question, if I understantd the 2nd problem of the summaries tables, it's because the way that we write the score and the flags of the hosts countries, right ? Greetings. --Faycal.09 (talk) 12:1394, 20 November 2011 (UTC)

BBC Radio issue.

I specifically told a few edits ago to just post broadcasters. No departments, channels or whatsoever. If you are going to post departments then, instead of posting BBC in the Television section, why don't you post BBC Sport, since it is the Sport department for BBC's television programming. Or post RDP, instead of RTP, since the radio department of RTP is RDP. This is nothing about links, but rather about coherence. Yeah, it's not pretty nor great, because we are not going to use a "useful" link, but that's the way it should be. Thank you for your time. --JDamanWP (talk) 18:53, 14 December 2011 (UTC)

Europa League broadcast

Your edit summary says that India is included in South Asia so where is the table for South Asia? There are only two lists Europe and Rest of the World.--Vyom25 (talk) 04:33, 25 February 2012 (UTC)

ok, understood.--Vyom25 (talk) 11:40, 25 February 2012 (UTC)

"No such practice in the past"

Just because we haven't done something in the past - like inserting a thin line into qualifying tables to better break up those eliminated in the qualifying periods - it doesn't mean that we can't start doing it. The reason why I put that line there is because Wikipedia uses a sans-serif font for its articles (though the editing window uses a serif font). Sans-serif fonts are bad when viewed in a large block of text because it is difficult for the eye to follow it as fluidly as it would a serif font. My eye has occasionally gotten lost in the tables, even with the semented times. By putting that line in, we break the table up a little, and by breaking the table up, we break up the text, thereby making the table a little easier to read. Prisonermonkeys (talk) 22:51, 17 March 2012 (UTC)

Chinese character help

I found you under the category of wikipedians who are native speakers of chinese. I need help with this: "pronounced differently elsewhere. For example, X and 西"

If you click on the link, you will see two characters at the top of the page, where i placed the X in the sentence. I just don't know what the first character is because I'm not fluent enough in chinese, it displays perfectly well and you will be able to see it. I knew the second character so I was able to type it here. Can you tell me what it is or even type it?Tatadou (talk) 03:38, 26 March 2012 (UTC)

I have a picture of the page over here at http://www.flickr.com/photos/76522480@N05/6872574146/in/photostream

I need the first character.Tatadou (talk) 20:15, 26 March 2012 (UTC)

Sky Sports issue.

You've got yourself all wrong there. If you actually have read the reference, you would notice that the ref indicates that the SD feeds of those extra streams are FTA channels, so anyone, even persons who aren't Sky Digital costumers, can receive them, through satellite television. The reference also states the the SD and HD versions of those streams will be broadcast on BBC's own website. Yeah, that's right: BBC'S WEBSITE!!! That online thingy we use to check, every time we want to check some English-language news. Yap, they'll broadcast those feeds there to. Sky Digital will only be responsible for the guaranteeing the EPG slots on their TV service, so the only thing Sky is actually involved, is organizing those streams on their EPG list, and also getting the exclusive access to the HD feeds of such streams for TV broadcast. Broadcast mambo-jambo will be made by our great friends from the Beeb. JDamanWP (talk) 21:16, 23 April 2012 (UTC)

"BSkyB is to show ‘every second of the BBC’s 2012 Olympics coverage’ with the help of 24 brand new channels, dedicated to the London Games. More than 10 million Sky homes will be able to watch the 2012 London Olympics through two dozen brand new BBC channels which will be dedicated to the BBC’s live coverage of the games. Coverage will also be available on Virgin Media’s cable platform." This is what is written in the first paragraph of ref nr 60. I reinforce the part "every second of the BBC's 2012 Olympics coverage". I don't see where Sky Sports is a part of the official coverage, since Sky Digital will only carry the HD feeds of those extra streams to TV users. If you don't understand what you read, that's up to you, but now, don't post incorrect info based on your own misinterpretation of the references shown. JDamanWP (talk) 17:01, 24 April 2012 (UTC)

I said feeds as in extra channels that will broadcast more content. Those extra channels will be broadcast by BBC and not by Sky, as I already explained. Sky will only be handled with the EPG-slots management for the HD versions of those channels. If you don't understand basic English, than stop editing on the English Wikipedia, because otherwise, you're not helping at all.JDamanWP (talk) 09:36, 25 April 2012 (UTC)

I still don't agree with the maintenance of Sky Sports as a 2012 London Olympics broadcaster. Sky will have no part in broadcasting any event of the Olympics in the UK, since those are BBC channels, and not Sky ones... I'm super-tired of explaining that to you, but you don't seem to understand... As such, I will remove Sky Sports as a broadcaster, since that is erroneous information, and as being such, it should be removed.JDamanWP (talk) 19:27, 5 May 2012 (UTC)

It seems that someone already erased. See... Instead of being an arse to someone, why don't you start to use the webz for something more than to show some know-it-all attitude. I got tired, for weeks, of explaining to you, why the hell was I right about this subject. It seems that you really needed someone from the UK to rub that on your face. From now on, I will not collaborate with you in any discussion, since you proved that you're not up to when it comes to realize that your actually wrong about something.JDamanWP (talk) 19:27, 5 May 2012 (UTC)

Speedy deletion declined: ClassicVision

Hello Aleenf1. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of ClassicVision, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: Clearly created in wrong namespace. Thank you. — Malik Shabazz ^Talk/_Stalk 14:44, 2 May 2012 (UTC)

Speedy deletion declined: Talk:Grabriela rivero

Hello Aleenf1. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of Talk:Grabriela rivero, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: Article created in wrong namespace. Thank you. — Malik Shabazz ^Talk/_Stalk 14:50, 4 May 2012 (UTC)

Speedy deletion declined: Howard Smalley

Hello Aleenf1. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of Howard Smalley, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: Article that was created on Talk page. Thank you. — Malik Shabazz ^Talk/_Stalk 15:04, 7 May 2012 (UTC)

Talkback

Hello, Aleenf1. You have new messages at Malik Shabazz's talk page.
Message added 15:12, 7 May 2012 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Speedied subpage

Hi. Re Talk:Michael A. Bellesiles/subpage that you speedy tagged (dependent on nonexistent page), it was created for a current ongoing discussion at BLP/N (and Talk:Michael A. Bellesiles) regarding the article. Would you mind removing the CSD tag? Thanks! --92.6.200.56 (talk) 17:08, 13 May 2012 (UTC)

Hello, everything is sorted out now. It's been deleted & restored. It was unclear that it was an intentional subpage/workpage when you tagged it, so I put a note at the top once it was undeleted. Thank you for all you do for Wikipedia. Best wishes, 92.6.200.56 (talk) 20:24, 13 May 2012 (UTC).

Regarding your recent moves

Hello.

Regarding your recent moves of field hockey pages with the word "roster" in them to names with "squad". I take it you are certain of this? Could you provide any references, such as official websites for international bodies, or the like?

Thanks

HandsomeFella (talk) 14:06, 28 May 2012 (UTC)

(moving your input here to keep the discussion in one place)

[5][6]. They all name the squads, not rosters. --Aleen f1 16:12, 28 May 2012 (UTC)

Actually, on google, I get the following:

field hockey roster, 195 million hits, versus field hockey squad, 182 million,
field hockey team roster, 20.8 million hits, versus field hockey team squad, 13.6 million.

In double quotes, this is the result:

"field hockey roster", 181 000 hits, versus "field hockey squad", 308 000 hits,
"field hockey team roster", 50 100 hits, versus "field hockey team squad", 4 hits (sic!).

That would suggest that both expressions are rather commonly used, with a slight edge for "roster".

I will bring this up to WP:RM to see if a consensus can be reached.

Cheers. HandsomeFella (talk) 17:04, 28 May 2012 (UTC)

Watch http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:89.235.241.211 please — Preceding unsigned comment added by 89.235.222.238 (talk) 10:41, 14 June 2012 (UTC)

Again: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:89.235.241.211 . Answered you. 84.52.44.104 (talk) 16:17, 18 June 2012 (UTC)

I've cited that you deleted countries India and Sri Lanka in Euro 2012 broadcasting article. Do not show bias towards these two countries in that article. Broadcasters stated from India and Sri Lanka currently air that football tournament. DuskRider 03:56, 1 July 2012 (UTC)

India is included in South Asia section as UEFA not just awarded the rights to India only, and i know Carlton Sports doing the broadcast, but make sure someone can bring more direct reference, not simply just a website. That is the rules of verifiability. Thank you. --Aleen f1 03:58, 1 July 2012 (UTC)

Deletion under G8

Thanks for patrolling those new pages. In the future, when you find a new article created where the talk page should go, you can just move it to the correct article namespace location rather than having it deleted. I've done this for Legoarchibiaea, Titilladucinini, and Chalixlepidohistum. -- Selket ^Talk 16:30, 16 July 2012 (UTC)

Field hockey

Hey, then insert the templates in the article because that's why they are created. Kante4 (talk) 15:38, 19 July 2012 (UTC)

Sorry, the article only have just over 10KB, which is fair under Wiki policy, plus you never request for name change (currently use is what is designated at early time), also MOS problem. Sorry. --Aleen f1 15:41, 19 July 2012 (UTC)

Those templates are used in different articles (roster article, country article, national field hockey team article], so a template is the best way and it's done with every teamsport in the 2012 olympics, you can look it up here. I have inserted them into the squad articles. Kante4 (talk) 15:46, 19 July 2012 (UTC)

I don't get it. Under article size <40KB should not consider split, plus template have limit due to it increasing load time on server and article, and this does not when use the code for article itself. --Aleen f1 15:58, 19 July 2012 (UTC)

So you want to add the roster to every other article that needs it by hand? I know it's not that big but with those templates it's just 2,000KB or so. It's just makes it so much easier to insert them there. Don't get it why you are against it, look at the volleyball/basketball roster/squad articles for the 2012 olympics. Kante4 (talk) 16:01, 19 July 2012 (UTC)

I don't want to debate about the others. As i said, one article which under 40KB are not consider to split, and why i even need to create one article for just 2KB itself but have lot of templates? Template is not substitution for data directly in the source of the page itself, maybe that can be use in national team but i strongly against the use of template for article less than 40KB, but just to increase the server load time. --Aleen f1 16:10, 19 July 2012 (UTC)

Oh man... Kante4 (talk) 16:14, 19 July 2012 (UTC)

For me it loaded quicker with the templates than the other way, just for the record. Kante4 (talk) 16:19, 19 July 2012 (UTC)

Hello all. I've described the purpose on my talkpage, as a reply to Kante4. HandsomeFella (talk) 16:22, 19 July 2012 (UTC)

Replied at HandsomeFella's talkpage. Kante4 (talk) 00:54, 21 July 2012 (UTC)

Olympics

Ok, but then the discipline should be deleted from the hockeybox? Kante4 (talk) 14:49, 29 July 2012 (UTC)

RE: Report -- Thats 2008. Well needa bigger consensus and as bball and football use london 2012Lihaas (talk) 16:02, 30 July 2012 (UTC)

Actually per BRD you do need consensus, one view does not mean its valid when challegned. Lihaas (talk) 19:43, 30 July 2012 (UTC)

Thats why we use webarchive on WP. Even seen a bot that does it(Lihaas (talk) 22:10, 30 July 2012 (UTC)).

List of 2012 Summer Olympics broadcasters

why are you removed the sri lankan official srilankan broadcasters in Olympic 2012 — Preceding unsigned comment added by 61.245.168.9 (talk) 06:08, 2 August 2012 (UTC)

What you mean? --Aleen f1 12:11, 2 August 2012 (UTC)

Lee Chong Wei's place of birth

Please take note that Lee's place of birth is Bagan Serai, Perak but not George Town, Penang. You may refer to his autobiography that called "Dare to be a Champion" which is published in January 2012. I'm very surprised that you reverted my modification although I already cited his book. Mnemonic kek (talk) 17:09, 4 August 2012 (UTC)

"Cleanup"

Hello Aleenf1.

I can understand why you are removing empty parameters like discipline1 and discipline2 from Template:2012 Summer Olympics men's field hockey game D2, but why do you remove the stadium parameter? Where a match was played is highly relevant in most circumstances, don't you think so?

HandsomeFella (talk) 13:35, 10 August 2012 (UTC)

Sorry, hockey always play in one stadium, the info already served in infobox, do you think adding same thing into 30+ hockey matches is helpful? --Aleen f1 13:52, 10 August 2012 (UTC)

Sure, it plays in one stadium, but which one? HandsomeFella (talk) 14:53, 10 August 2012 (UTC)

Infobox tells it. Don't play fool to me, please understand that hockey is not football, which play in various stadium and demand a note, hockey is NOT! --Aleen f1 14:58, 10 August 2012 (UTC)

Please stop

Please stop your disruptive revertions. There is – obviously – no need have articles at the size of 10 k bytes, when they can be 1500 bytes.

Duplicating code is just plain stupid.

HandsomeFella (talk) 15:06, 10 August 2012 (UTC)

Please looking the WP:Article size before voice your comment. --Aleen f1 15:07, 10 August 2012 (UTC)

Maybe you should read it yourself. This is not about article splitting. HandsomeFella (talk) 15:08, 10 August 2012 (UTC)

I think you should read about Wikipedia:Template limits. Article size still stand if they can apply. --Aleen f1 15:12, 10 August 2012 (UTC)

August 2012

You have been blocked from editing for a short time for your disruption caused by edit warring and violation of the three-revert rule at Field hockey at the 2012 Summer Olympics – Women's team squads and Field hockey at the 2012 Summer Olympics – Men's team squads. During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}} below this notice, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. — foxj 15:18, 10 August 2012 (UTC)

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Aleenf1 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

No reason

Decline reason:

I'm not quite sure I understand your reason for unblock, below, but it sounds like you are calling Wikipedia's WP:EW policy useless? You are always welcome to seek consensus to change it, but unless you can get it changed, you must abide by it - the point is that, with only a very small number of exceptions, you must not edit war even if you are right. -- Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 16:05, 10 August 2012 (UTC)

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Apologise if i misuse the template. I'm just want to know if someone have war just to apply policy of editing and finally getting block, is that policy is something useless? --Aleen f1 15:39, 10 August 2012 (UTC)

I'm labelled myself foolish because too follow the instructions. --Aleen f1 15:52, 10 August 2012 (UTC)

Enjoy my break! After so long time. Thanks man. Policy is made by human and why i should challenge it, Boing! said Zebedee? Even admin can pill a threat: "If you do so I can promise you you'll be blocked for a longer period of time." in this page, this message barred people from doing something right. --Aleen f1 16:34, 10 August 2012 (UTC)