User talk:Alfonso.miguel

Speedy deletion nomination of Energy efficient, cost effective and sustainable desalination technology analysis in Australia

You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles. See the Article Wizard.

Thank you.

A tag has been placed on Energy efficient, cost effective and sustainable desalination technology analysis in Australia, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article that does not provide sufficient context to identify its subject. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. If you plan to expand the article, you can request that administrators wait a while for you to add contextual material. To do this, affix the template {{hangon}} to the article and state your intention on the article's talk page. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Peridon (talk) 21:44, 16 April 2010 (UTC)

Non-free files in your user space

Hey there Alfonso.miguel, thank you for your contributions. I am a bot, alerting you that non-free files are not allowed in user or talk space. I removed some files I found on User:Alfonso.miguel/Energy efficient, cost effective and sustainable desalination technology analysis in Australia. In the future, please refrain from adding fair-use files to your user-space drafts or your talk page.

• See a log of files removed today here.

• Shut off the bot here.

• Report errors here.

Thank you, -- DASHBot (talk) 00:42, 18 April 2010 (UTC)

New article

Hello Alfonso.miguel. I see that you have put a great deal of work into your new article. Unfortunately, that article appears to be largely a reproduction of material already available desalinization and List of desalination plants in Australia. May I suggest you review those two articles and consider how your article's content may be merged with them? Wikipedia strives to maintain a single article on each topic so as to avoid content forking. WikiDan61^ChatMe!_ReadMe!! 20:27, 3 May 2010 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Seawater desalination in Australia - A sustainable way

The article Seawater desalination in Australia - A sustainable way has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

essay /original research

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 08:22, 4 May 2010 (UTC)

Nomination of Seawater desalination in Australia for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Seawater desalination in Australia is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Seawater desalination in Australia until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Paris1127 (talk) 04:18, 1 February 2012 (UTC)