User talk:Omnis Scientia

AfC notification: Draft:List of Negro league baseball no-hitters has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:List of Negro league baseball no-hitters. Thanks! Ozzie10aaaa (talk) 14:43, 23 September 2024 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: List of Negro league baseball no-hitters has been accepted

List of Negro league baseball no-hitters, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Ozzie10aaaa (talk) 14:43, 23 September 2024 (UTC)

Women in Red October 2024

Women in Red | October 2024, Volume 10, Issue 10, Numbers 293, 294, 318, 319, 320 Online events: New: Women in STEM | Geofocus: Islands I-P | Women in archaeology Continuing: #1day1woman | Education (year-long initiative) Announcements from other communities October is Women in Green's "Around the World in 31 Days" Good Article Edit-a-thon Tip of the month: Unsure how to expand a stub article? Take a look at this guidance Other ways to participate: Become a member. You can always opt-out of notifications. Join the conversations on our talkpage. Help us plan future events and add any general ideas on developing the project. Follow us on social media: Instagram | Pinterest | Twitter/X

--Lajmmoore (talk 08:07, 29 September 2024 (UTC) via MassMessaging

As I said ..

I stand by my prior comments. But in the interest of dialogue and reaching a mutual acceptable - if not ideal to either of us, given our divergent views - conclusion to the matter, in accord with the values of the Project, I would propose for your consideration that both of those See alsos (the ones you deleted, and the ones you added) remain on those few(er) pages that relate to individuals who are in both lists. 2603:7000:2101:AA00:B5B4:44F9:9229:B399 (talk) 03:08, 30 September 2024 (UTC)

Please stop. It's one thing for you to seek to reinsert your preferred see also. It's quite another for you to delete a perfectly acceptable see also that has been there for years. Until you started deleting it. That's not collaborative. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 184.153.21.19 (talk) 21:27, 16 October 2024 (UTC)

There is no discussion here. Stop adding the non-baseball related list, which is NOT exclusive to Jewish athletes but also includes athletes of Jewish descent who don't necessarily identify as Jewish, to baseball articles. I created the featured list specifically to replace that list. That you keep adding both makes no sense because they aren't as related as you make them out to be.

Now PLEASE stop this constant insistence that your preference is right simply because you say so or because its "been there for years". I made a list which passes Wikipedia accessibility standards, is properly referenced, and with a set criteria. That you don't like the list is not a good enough reason to enforce your will on me. Omnis Scientia (talk) 21:41, 16 October 2024 (UTC)

• I will leave a lengthier reply later. But for now, please note that I have edited the see also that you have deleted numerous times, to reflect that it relates not only to select Jews in baseball, but rather to the larger group of select Jews in sports. Hopefully, in an exercise of collegiality, that will satisfy you. I hope that you will embrace collegiality 2600:1017:B83C:8505:644A:FD39:D998:A29A (talk) 22:27, 16 October 2024 (UTC)

  No. Don't reply back again with a "lenghthier reply". Just please, leave me alone. Omnis Scientia (talk) 23:36, 16 October 2024 (UTC)

You’re not responding to reason. There is zero reason for you to make that last deletion. And to boot - you did it with tools. That is not a proper use of tools. There is no vandalism. Plus - the list is not coterminous with yours. If you won’t engage in collegial discussion, and will not self-revert (which would I would suggest be appropriate), let’s involve admins. This is feeling somewhat like ownership and I don’t like it, without collegiality and discussion. 2600:1017:B83E:2606:D444:D905:584C:B96E (talk) 01:38, 17 October 2024 (UTC)

Sorry but I gave plenty of reasons; you just chose to ignore every reason and explanation I've given. I also made it clear over a month ago that I see this disruptive editing and revert it as such where ever I come across it because you have not provided a good enough reason for why you're doing it beyond "it was always there so it should remain there".

As for admin, I've already involved @Muboshgu who is active in baseball articles. I gave them links to both convos and the background because I've had it with your passive aggressive attitude and harrassment over such a minute detail. Take it up with them now. I just replaced an old list with a much better quality one I created specifically to replace the old one. I don't see what is wrong with that or why its even such a big deal. Just stop it and leave me alone. Omnis Scientia (talk) 08:27, 17 October 2024 (UTC)

New message to Omnis Scientia

I accidentally managed to revert your edit. I did not read your edit summary and was confused. Dont worry, I undid my edit. Cooldudeseven7 (Discuss over a cup of tea?) 12:11, 2 October 2024 (UTC)

@Cooldudeseven7, no worries! It happens sometimes! :) As I explained in the edit summary, I thought the list wasn't really informative and was actually more misleading than helpful. Wins Above Replacement is such a multi-layered stat that its hard make a list which is helpful. Omnis Scientia (talk) 12:23, 2 October 2024 (UTC)

Do you think the page should be Speedy Deleted? Im talking about the one of where you removed the listCooldudeseven7 (Discuss over a cup of tea?) 12:36, 2 October 2024 (UTC)

Umm... I don't really have an opinion on that. I was just surprised to come across the list and found it to be a copy of the list from the website. And there's a difference of opinion on which WAR formula is more accurate/better, whether defensive WAR is reliable or not, why is there a big difference between bWAR and fWAR, etc. etc. I though blanking was the best path.

I do think that speedy delete would not have gone through. There's a fanatic minority who feels strongly about it and I'm sure they are on here and will object even if they understand the reason! Omnis Scientia (talk) 12:52, 2 October 2024 (UTC)

Got it. Happy editing and thank you! Cooldudeseven7 (Discuss over a cup of tea?) 13:41, 2 October 2024 (UTC)

@Cooldudeseven7, thank you for the barnstar! Much appreciated! 😊 Omnis Scientia (talk) 16:19, 2 October 2024 (UTC)

No problem! Cooldudeseven7 (Discuss over a cup of tea?) 17:03, 2 October 2024 (UTC)

Hey! I just had my edit, which redid your edit reverted. It has now replaced the list on that page instead of keeping the redirect. Cooldudeseven7 (Discuss over a cup of tea?) 11:36, 4 October 2024 (UTC)

No worries about that. Not too surprised either. As I said, it is a notable and many people feel differently. I'll be talking it over in the Baseball WikiProject and seeing if we can improve it or not if it is going to be kept. Omnis Scientia (talk) 11:48, 4 October 2024 (UTC)

Got it! Thank you! (I am going to unwatchlist that page) Cooldudeseven7 (Discuss over a cup of tea?) 11:54, 4 October 2024 (UTC)

Thanks for all the help! :) Omnis Scientia (talk) 12:09, 4 October 2024 (UTC)

No problem! Cooldudeseven7 (Discuss over a cup of tea?) 12:11, 4 October 2024 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

	The Special Barnstar
	Thank you for being such a great and loyal contributer to Wikipedia! Cooldudeseven7 (Discuss over a cup of tea?) 13:41, 2 October 2024 (UTC)

Manager templates

I reverted adding Brooklyn to the Dodgers manager templates because there were numerous other names they used early on. Including all the names in the template would look ridiculous. Yankees10 17:08, 6 October 2024 (UTC)

@Yankees10, no problem. That's fair enough! Omnis Scientia (talk) 17:17, 6 October 2024 (UTC)

Jeff Passan

Hi, I have reverted this edit on Jeff Passan in which you added an unsourced birth date and birth name. Please refrain from adding unsourced BLP information in the future. Thanks. Rift (talk) 19:36, 11 October 2024 (UTC)

@Rift, alright but do add back the links (if any) which may have been removed by your revert. Best regards, Omnis Scientia (talk) 22:16, 11 October 2024 (UTC)

DYK for Mike Veeck

On 14 October 2024, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Mike Veeck, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Mike Veeck's baseball promotions include Disco Demolition Night, a game with no fans, and the world's largest pillow fight? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Mike Veeck. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Mike Veeck), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

^Complex/_Rational 00:03, 14 October 2024 (UTC)