User talk:Allencoh

Your submission at Articles for creation: MyRegistry.com (June 18)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time.
Please read the comments left by the reviewer on your submission. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Draft:MyRegistry.com.
• To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, or on the .

Thank you for your
contributions to Wikipedia!

• Please remember to link to the submission!

• You can also get real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Chris Troutman (talk) 18:17, 18 June 2014 (UTC)

Hello! Allencoh, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering or curious about why your article submission was declined please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Chris Troutman (talk) 18:17, 18 June 2014 (UTC)

@Chris Troutman: I am completely confused with Wiki and I'm about to give up. Can you please specify what part of the article is "advertisement?" I ran this past four other people and I'm sorry, but I just don't understand your opinion. I am pleading with you...please show me the way! I would so greatly appreciate it. Thank you so much in advance. Allencoh (talk) 20:11, 18 June 2014 (UTC)

The article has a "features" section! That information has no "so what" value; it's there to advertise. Take a look at Amazon.com. It's about Amazon from a disinterested third-party point of view. It's not providing "rah-rah, good stuff about Amazon" nonsense. I'm not saying that the features listed aren't correct; they likely are. My point is that Wikipedia is not here to advertise.

There's three ways you can do this: I can gut your submission and rewrite it and you can resubmit it, or you can rewrite it yourself and resubmit, or you can place a request at the reward board. I've reviewed your submission once and will not be reviewing it again. Chris Troutman (talk) 01:48, 19 June 2014 (UTC)

@Chris Troutman: I would so appreciate it for the former of the three choices...I'd be indebted to you if you would rewrite it and submit it. I completely respect your advice and therefore would be honored if you resubmitted it after your rewrite. Thank you in advance! Let me know. Best, Allencoh (talk) 14:33, 19 June 2014 (UTC)

I've completely re-written it. I'm not making an accusation, but if someone were told to write this article on behalf of another party, they should be aware that it makes more sense to hire a professional editor rather than attempt to "do it yourself." Taking screenshots from the company's "in the media" website and lazily copying phrases directly from source material is a poor method of drafting an article. I'd also like to point out that while many companies would balk at the inclusion of criticism in a Wikipedia article about them, negative coverage is good for inches of text and reliable independent sources, not to mention definite neutral point of view.

You are welcome to resubmit this entry. I'll have nothing more to do with it. Chris Troutman (talk) 07:36, 20 June 2014 (UTC)

@Chris Troutman: Well, thank you and I do appreciate it. Allencoh (talk) 13:53, 20 June 2014 (UTC)

I didn't see the submission waiting for review yellow box, so I regret to say that I did it two more times. Please excuse my ignorance--can someone delete the two unnecessary boxes? Please! Allencoh (talk) 13:52, 20 June 2014 (UTC)

Your submission at AfC MyRegistry.com was accepted

MyRegistry.com, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

• If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
• If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

James^x12345 22:27, 26 June 2014 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of File:MyRegistry.com logo.png

The file File:MyRegistry.com logo.png has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Aged logo, superseded by File:Myregistry-green.png. No current or future use.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 00:21, 19 March 2020 (UTC)