Jump to content

User talk:Alohahell

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Some comments will be deleted after time for clean-up, please don't take it personally. ;)

Ooops

[edit]

Wrong page, sorry :) ViperSnake151  Talk  20:21, 27 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Flag icons on ship article infoboxes

[edit]

Please note that flag icons only hold meaning to ship articles in regard to the question of the Port of Registry for the ship (ie: under what flag does the ship sail). Because of this, I reverted this edit on the MS Oasis of the Seas article. --- Barek (talk • contribs) - 19:25, 12 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

FYI: The "Turku Finland" information refers to the physical location of the shipyard where the construction was done by the builder. This is documented here. --- Barek (talk • contribs) - 19:39, 12 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Yes, but that has nothing to do with the builder - that information belongs to location, not to the builder, who is STX Europe. Alohahell (talk) 19:40, 12 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Actually, the way it should have been worded (as is common in other ship articles) is "STX Europe yards in Turku Finland". --- Barek (talk • contribs) - 19:42, 12 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
The builder is STX Europe, not "STX Europe yards". There is no shipbuilder company called "STX Europe yards". "Turku Finland" doesn't belong here, it should go to the location section. Alohahell (talk) 19:47, 12 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
There is no "built location" field. It has never been needed before because the use in other ship articles has been to place the physical location of the shipyard used by the builder in the "built" field. I'll bring this up at WT:SHIPS so that input from others involved in ship articles can also review this issue. --- Barek (talk • contribs) - 19:51, 12 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
FYI: A discussion has been started at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Ships#Request additional input on the use of the "Ship builder" field. Your input at that discussion page would be appreciated. --- Barek (talk • contribs) - 20:02, 12 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Stop violating copyrights by uploading copyrighted photos and claiming they were your own work. File:Shinsegae Centum City department store in Busan, South Korea.jpg was not your own work, and now I am going to have to check the rest of your uploads as well.

If you continue violating copyrights, your account will be blocked. rʨanaɢ talk/contribs 16:54, 2 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

No problem and no need to threaten me like that (so scared now!! LOL), I have a picture I took of the department store while I was in Busan last summer, that will do, right? ^^ Alohahell (talk) 16:57, 2 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
In the meantime, would you care to tell me which other photo uploads of yours are photos you did not take? rʨanaɢ talk/contribs 17:05, 2 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
I only uploaded the department store pic from guinness world records because I couldn't find a nice looking night view of it. Trust me, it looks way better at night with LED lighting all over it!! But I do have a day view of it, which still looks nice. All other pictures as far as I know, are all mine and edited with PhotoScape. What do you think of my pics btw? ^^ Alohahell (talk) 17:09, 2 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Oh, and you have ignored my previous question.. -_-;
File:World's largest department store in Busan, South Korea.jpg is, no offense, a rather low-quality image—low resolution, dull colors, lots of aliasing. If you're such a talented photographer and you have access to such great views and editing software, may I ask why this image is so much worse than the rest of the images you've uploaded? rʨanaɢ talk/contribs 17:37, 2 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
LOL I'm NOT a talented photographer. Thanks for the compliment, but I'm really not. ;) Alohahell (talk) 05:30, 3 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
So, in other words, you didn't photograph most of the pictures you've uploaded. Right? rʨanaɢ talk/contribs 23:37, 4 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Did I say that? No. I rejected your compliment, that's all. My photographs are vastly better than the ones in Wikipedia. Don't you think? I've made many articles much better with my photographs. Alohahell (talk) 07:05, 5 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
No, adding copyvio to articles does not improve them.
And by the way, I never intended what I said as a compliment. You have not done anything deserving of compliment. I was merely pointing out the inconsistency in the claims you make about your uploads. rʨanaɢ talk/contribs 06:35, 9 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hi! :) How did you get into North Korea to take that photo of the hotel? Isn't it illegal to take photos in the country? Glad you made it out alive! :) Brisbane Man (talk) 13:37, 16 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of File:Ryugyong Hotel under construction on 26 August 2009.jpg

[edit]

A tag has been placed on File:Ryugyong Hotel under construction on 26 August 2009.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a clear copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words.

If the external website belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website but have permission from that owner, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission. You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Choyoołʼįįhí:Seb az86556 > haneʼ 05:02, 6 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

February 2010

[edit]

Your addition has been removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without permission from the copyright holder. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of article content such as sentences or images. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Choyoołʼįįhí:Seb az86556 > haneʼ 05:03, 6 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello. Concerning your contribution, File:Daegu Tower.jpg, please note that Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images obtained from other web sites or printed material, without the permission of the author(s). This article or image appears to be a direct copy from http://english.daegu.go.kr/UploadFile/photo/daegu002.jpg. As a copyright violation, File:Daegu Tower.jpg appears to qualify for deletion under the speedy deletion criteria. File:Daegu Tower.jpg has been tagged for deletion, and may have been deleted by the time you see this message.

If you believe that the article or image is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under the Creative Commons Attribution/Share-Alike License (CC-BY-SA) then you should do one of the following:

However, for textual content, you may simply consider rewriting the content in your own words. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with our copyright policy. Wikipedia takes copyright concerns very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Thank you. Caspian blue 05:36, 6 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Others are too patient with you

[edit]

Look, you better quit that shit. It's tedious to have to go through all the files you uploaded to see if you didn't blatantly lie about them like you did with the two above. We're not your babysitters. I suggest you refrain from uploading files altogether. Choyoołʼįįhí:Seb az86556 > haneʼ 05:43, 6 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Ryugyong Hotel under construction on 26 August 2009.jpg listed for deletion

[edit]

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, File:Ryugyong Hotel under construction on 26 August 2009.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. rʨanaɢ talk/contribs 05:52, 6 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

To track your images

[edit]

Due to your history of uploading copyright images, I'm adding this gallery of your images. This is incomplete, but well...since all don't have EXIF, and some of the images' angle were taken from helicopter, I strongly believe that those are not your images. If you can provide "original file" with EXIF, that would clear any suspicion over your image contribution. Regards. --Caspian blue 05:58, 6 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello. Concerning your contribution, File:Sharks inside Busan Aquarium.jpg, please note that Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images obtained from other web sites or printed material, without the permission of the author(s). This article or image appears to be a direct copy from http://korailtours.emart.co.kr/image_rail/%EC%95%84%EC%BF%A0%EC%95%84%EB%A6%AC%EC%9B%802%282%29.jpg. As a copyright violation, File:Sharks inside Busan Aquarium.jpg appears to qualify for deletion under the speedy deletion criteria. File:Sharks inside Busan Aquarium.jpg has been tagged for deletion, and may have been deleted by the time you see this message.

If you believe that the article or image is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under the Creative Commons Attribution/Share-Alike License (CC-BY-SA) then you should do one of the following:

However, for textual content, you may simply consider rewriting the content in your own words. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with our copyright policy. Wikipedia takes copyright concerns very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Thank you. Caspian blue 06:06, 6 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello. Concerning your contribution, File:Daegu Montage.jpg, please note that Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images obtained from other web sites or printed material, without the permission of the author(s). This article or image appears to be a direct copy from http://english.daegu.go.kr/UploadFile/photo/daegu002.jpg. As a copyright violation, File:Daegu Montage.jpg appears to qualify for deletion under the speedy deletion criteria. File:Daegu Montage.jpg has been tagged for deletion, and may have been deleted by the time you see this message.

If you believe that the article or image is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under the Creative Commons Attribution/Share-Alike License (CC-BY-SA) then you should do one of the following:

However, for textual content, you may simply consider rewriting the content in your own words. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with our copyright policy. Wikipedia takes copyright concerns very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Thank you. Caspian blue 06:09, 6 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello. Concerning your contribution, File:Busan Asiad Stadium.jpg, please note that Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images obtained from other web sites or printed material, without the permission of the author(s). This article or image appears to be a direct copy from http://blog.naver.com/limhyeunjin/memo/120077116372. As a copyright violation, File:Busan Asiad Stadium.jpg appears to qualify for deletion under the speedy deletion criteria. File:Busan Asiad Stadium.jpg has been tagged for deletion, and may have been deleted by the time you see this message.

If you believe that the article or image is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under the Creative Commons Attribution/Share-Alike License (CC-BY-SA) then you should do one of the following:

However, for textual content, you may simply consider rewriting the content in your own words. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with our copyright policy. Wikipedia takes copyright concerns very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Thank you. Caspian blue 06:36, 6 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

ANI notice

[edit]

I have started a thread at the Administrator's Noticeboard discussing your conduct. WP:ANI#User:Alohahell repeatedly uploading copyvio, is a block in order? rʨanaɢ talk/contribs 06:01, 6 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked

[edit]

You have been blocked indefinitely for a history of copyright violations and persistent lying about images. Fut.Perf. ☼ 17:16, 6 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Alohahell&oldid=1083566063"