Jump to content

User talk:AltecLansing12

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Welcome[edit]

Hello, AltecLansing12! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions to this free encyclopedia. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username and the date. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement. Happy editing! Verbal chat 15:44, 10 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Getting started
Getting help
Policies and guidelines

The community

Writing articles
Miscellaneous

Additional information needed on Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Ananny[edit]

Hello. Thank you for filing Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Ananny. This is an automated notice to inform you that the case is currently missing a code letter, which indicates to checkusers why a check is valid. Please revisit the page and add this. Sincerely, SPCUClerkbot (talk) 19:35, 10 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I'm very confused. What in Ananny's only edit leads you to believe that they have anything at all to do with Grawp? I'm starting to agree that a checkuser may be in order, but not for BIGDADDYSCHUCKWAGON or Annany. --OnoremDil 19:56, 10 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Blocked for sock puppetry. --Kanonkas :  Talk  20:07, 10 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

AltecLansing12 (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

I am a sockpuppet but the edits on this account arent all completely vandalism.If you take a look at some of the Speedy requests in my deleted contributions that can show some form of good faith.I would also have made the unblock request on the main but the talk page is locked.If even that cant prove that I can be given a chance despite my ongoing abuse of socks then nothing will.I have changed and that proof is supporting my request

Decline reason:

If you have completely solved the problems that made your block necessary, then you can request unblock through your original account. If the best you can offer is that your edits 'aren't all completely vandalism,' the answer will be 'no.' FisherQueen (talk · contribs) 21:03, 10 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

FQ apparently missed that you said that your main account's talk page is locked. Ok, if you want to have an honest discussion about being unblocked, you first need to list every account you operate so we can have an idea of who we are dealing with. Mangojuicetalk 21:05, 10 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

{{helpme|Pickbothmanlol}}

{{helpme}} is not for unblock requests, or anything related to unblock. If you wish to ask for unblock for your main account, you can use the unblock-en-l mailing list to request unblocking.//roux   22:34, 10 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]