User talk:Alymacq

This is Alymacq's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Your submission at Articles for creation: 411 Music Group (August 4)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Jamiebuba was:

This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:411 Music Group and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Jamiebuba (talk) 11:06, 4 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Alymacq! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Jamiebuba (talk) 11:06, 4 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:411 Music Group[edit]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Draft:411 Music Group, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Jamiebuba (talk) 11:09, 4 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Jemiebuba!

Thank you very much for your feedback! I worked very hard on this article, and I decided to seek help from experienced Wiki editors. I will find someone today to assist me in making the article follow all of the Wiki guidelines. Would it be possible to remove the speedy deletion nomination tag for the draft so that the editor I work with can edit the draft I have already created? Thank you! Alymacq (talk) 11:43, 4 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Alymacq The speedy deletion tag had been removed, unfortunately you've been blocked for abusing multiple accounts which is against our policy. Jamiebuba (talk) 09:59, 6 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Jamiebuba,

I hope you're well. I am writing to address a situation regarding my Wikipedia accounts, which I deeply regret and sincerely apologize for. I understand that having two separate accounts, as was the case with my main account and the account under the username "alymacq11," is a violation of Wikipedia's policies, and I acknowledge my mistake and I would like to explain myself.The situation arose due to a misunderstanding where two interns, including myself, attempted to work on the same article from different accounts. This confusion led to the inappropriate use of multiple accounts. To rectify this, we have taken steps to address the issue internally. Moving forward, we have decided to engage an experienced Wikipedia editor, who will ensure the creation of an unbiased article for our company in accordance with Wikipedia's content guidelines.Could you please consider unblocking my main account, "alymacq", so that I can resume contributing to Wikipedia responsibly and transparently? I have discontinued the use of the "alymacq11" account and will not utilize it again.I am truly sorry for any disruption or inconvenience my previous actions may have caused to the Wikipedia community. I value the platform's mission to provide accurate and reliable information to the public, and I am eager to contribute positively within the established guidelines.Thank you for your understanding and for taking the time to review my request.

Sincerely,

Aly Alymacq (talk) 14:21, 7 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

August 2023[edit]

This account has been blocked indefinitely as a sockpuppet that was created to violate Wikipedia policy. Note that using multiple accounts is allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not, and that all edits made while evading a block or ban may be reverted or deleted. If this account is not a sockpuppet, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below. Bbb23 (talk) 13:43, 4 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello there! I had to create a new account because I lost access to my old one and couldn't restore access. Alymacq (talk) 15:06, 4 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

What do you mean by you "lost access"? You apparently regained access because since June 12 you have been editing with both accounts.--Bbb23 (talk) 15:19, 4 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Bbb23,

Thank you for all your help. I have just requested the unblocking of this "alymacq" account. To emphasize this, I am sending you this message I've sent to Wikipedia as well: I hope this message finds you well. I am writing to address a situation regarding my Wikipedia accounts, which I deeply regret and sincerely apologize for. I understand that having two separate accounts, as was the case with my main account and the account under the username "alymacq11," is a violation of Wikipedia's policies, and I acknowledge my mistake and I would like to explain myself.

The situation arose due to a misunderstanding where two interns, including myself, attempted to work on the same article from different accounts. This confusion led to the inappropriate use of multiple accounts. To rectify this, we have taken steps to address the issue internally. Moving forward, we have decided to engage an experienced Wikipedia editor, who will ensure the creation of an unbiased article for our company in accordance with Wikipedia's content guidelines.Could you please consider unblocking my main account, "alymacq", so that I can resume contributing to Wikipedia responsibly and transparently. I have discontinued the use of the "alymacq11" account and will not utilize it again.I am truly sorry for any disruption or inconvenience my previous actions may have caused to the Wikipedia community. I value the platform's mission to provide accurate and reliable information to the public, and I am eager to contribute positively within the established guidelines.Thank you for your understanding and for taking the time to review my request.

Sincerely,

Aly

Alymacq (talk) 14:32, 7 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Alymacq (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Dear Wikipedia Support Team, I hope this message finds you well. I am writing to address a situation regarding my Wikipedia accounts, which I deeply regret and sincerely apologize for. I understand that having two separate accounts, as was the case with my main account and the account under the username "alymacq11," is a violation of Wikipedia's policies, and I acknowledge my mistake and I would like to explain myself. The situation arose due to a misunderstanding where two interns, including myself, attempted to work on the same article from different accounts. This confusion led to the inappropriate use of multiple accounts. To rectify this, we have taken steps to address the issue internally. Moving forward, we have decided to engage an experienced Wikipedia editor, who will ensure the creation of an unbiased article for our company in accordance with Wikipedia's content guidelines. Could you please consider unblocking my main account, "alymacq", so that I can resume contributing to Wikipedia responsibly and transparently. I have discontinued the use of the "alymacq11" account and will not utilize it again. I am truly sorry for any disruption or inconvenience my previous actions may have caused to the Wikipedia community. I value the platform's mission to provide accurate and reliable information to the public, and I am eager to contribute positively within the established guidelines. Thank you for your understanding and for taking the time to review my request. Sincerely, Aly Alymacq (talk) 14:27, 7 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Please write another unblock request, and this time don't use ChatGPT to write it. — Ingenuity (talk • contribs) 23:51, 7 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.