User talk:AmandaRex

June 2019

This account has been blocked indefinitely as a sock puppet that was created to violate Wikipedia policy. Note that using multiple accounts is allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not, and that all edits made while evading a block or ban may be reverted or deleted. If this account is not a sock puppet, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below. Yunshui ^雲 _水 07:23, 4 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

AmandaRex (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

This account has no relation to Alvienking at all. I made a fresh account, which is my first Wikipedia account ever, to be able to start a discussion with User:GSS. In fact, I condemned the edits by Alvienking. I don't know on what grounds is it being called sockpuppetry. I didn't undo any changes by GSS and just commented a review request by him. Even our genders are different. Please look into it objectively.

Decline reason:

You've admitted to violations of WP:MEAT here. Come on now. "No relation to Alvienking at all"?!? You've already admitted you are part of the same team. You've also been violating WP:COI (for example, where on User:AmandaRex did you declare your conflict of interest, as you are required to do?). You, also, are a single-purpose account. It beggers belief that you can make the claims you have made about having no relation to that other editor. The block is appropriate. Please tell the rest of your team that this behaviour won't be tolerated here. Yamla (talk) 10:42, 4 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

AmandaRex (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

It's a freelance volunteer team Sir. People are hired for specific terms by respective people in the world of freelancing. I have no relation to Alvienking at all and neither have I met him ever in real life. He was an ex-marketing hire who has no relations to Rishabh or anyone associated with him at all anymore. The tasks handed to him were not at all related to WP as per my knowledge. And as for the declaration, I would duly do the needful immediately. Infact, if you go through my edit history, I have been trying to undo AlvienKing's actions related to Rishabh. I am not adding any content since that would be a violation of protocol, that I leave up to senior editors. Neither have I committed any action in favour of any entity or person. I began a discussion forum, on which such issues could've been mentioned. And as for the rest of the team, we understand the principles in practise on WP and no one else is going to take any steps in this matter. That was always clear. And I don't know where you found me using the same domain as that of Alvienking or any other user on Wikipedia. Please check and revert back.

Decline reason:

If you keep insisting that you and the person you work for have "no relation to Alvienking at all", there isn't a pathway to being unblocked for you. Alvienking is either part of your "team" or they aren't(you don't have to have met them). I am declining your request. 331dot (talk) 12:31, 4 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

AmandaRex (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Okay! I agree. Alivenking was part of Rishabh's hired freelancers some time back. I wasn't associated with Rishabh back then. The said person's contract got over and a week and a half later I joined. We technically belong to the same team but chronologically apart. I am new to Wikipedia. I know administrators would be closely monitoring me. So please advice me as to the steps I need to undertake, the declarations I need to make along with the undertaking I need to mention so that you may let my account exist. I will in no way relate my WP presence to Rishabh Dubey and his article. If I ever do, I am sure I'd be blocked indefinitely. I apologise for not following protocol. Please guide me as to how I can do that henceforth and I can assure you no further trouble from my side.

Decline reason:

Procedural decline; user has withdrawn unblock request, below. Yamla (talk) 10:39, 7 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Per WP:PAID please provide links to all places, where you advertise your business e.g. Upwork profile etc. Thank you. GSS (talk|c|em) 05:43, 5 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

My business is advertising itself Sir and has nothing to do with Wikipedia. I don't advertise my business since personal MoUs are sent to PoIs. I don't know what is an 'Upwork profile'. Wikipedia is an isolated profile I created recently and I believe I shouldn't have, considering the kind of bullying which persists here; and therefore request the page be sent for speedy deletion. I was here just to voice a concern which was ignored and fallacious allegations were raised time and again creating weird associations along with claims of I getting paid by someone. I dissociate myself completely with any entity or the will to be an editor for Wikipedia, since the support for amateurs is close to negligible. Thank You. — Preceding unsigned comment added by AmandaRex (talk • contribs)