User talk:Ameer al safar

Ame here

Palthu Janwar moved to draftspace[edit]

An article you recently created, Palthu Janwar, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. PICKLEDICAE🥒 14:34, 27 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Praxidicae I was about to add the other details. Ameer al safar (talk) 16:18, 27 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Great, do it in draft space. PICKLEDICAE🥒 16:18, 27 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Praxidicae Why Gold (2022 Indian film) is not moved ? Just to know the difference, So I can create my other article like that. Hope for a reply Ameer al safar (talk) 16:20, 27 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Poovan (film) Notability[edit]

Thanks for the article! Though the sources are independent and reliable, I'm unconvinced that they constitute of significant coverage required for the general notability guideline WP:GNG. These news pieces IMO are mostly minor announcements and routine releases on cast details, and do not seem to meet the significant coverage requirement. Per WP:GNG: Moreover, not all coverage in reliable sources constitutes evidence of notability for the purposes of article creation; for example, directories and databases, advertisements, announcements columns, and minor news stories are all examples of coverage that may not actually support notability when examined, despite their existence as reliable sources. Further, I don't think this meets additional notability guidelines at WP:NFILM, and my search also found mostly routine announcements, 1, 2. VickKiang (talk) 06:37, 30 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@VickKiang The developement is going on. Please wait Ameer al safar (talk) 06:49, 30 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Per WP:NFILM, Additionally, films that have already begun shooting, but have not yet been publicly released (theatres or video), should generally not have their own articles unless the production itself is notable per the notability guidelines. In your opinion how is the production process notable on its own? Many thanks! VickKiang (talk) 06:51, 30 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

January 2023[edit]

Wikipedia's technical logs indicate that this user account has been or may be used abusively. It has been blocked indefinitely from editing to prevent abuse.

Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should review the guide to appealing blocks, and then appeal your block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}}. Note that anything you post in your unblock request will be public, so you may alternatively use the Unblock Ticket Request System to submit an appeal if it contains information that must be private.

Administrators: Checkusers have access to confidential system logs not accessible by the public or by administrators due to the Wikimedia Foundation's privacy policy. You must not loosen or remove this block, or issue an IP block exemption, without consulting with a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee. Administrators who undo checkuser blocks without permission from a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee may be summarily desysopped.

Girth Summit _(blether) 15:06, 21 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I am blocked to edit Wikipedia and all my articles created got deleted. Why this happens?[edit]

@Qwerfjkl Hi Mentor, I am extremely disappointed that somebody blocked me to edit Wikipedia and states that I am a suspected abuser that I am a part of somebody else’s multiple accounts. I completely disagreeing with this decision of block. Also my Wikipedia articles I’ve created was deleted. I get only limited time to use Wikipedia from my work. I am 100 percent honest you that I don’t have any access and relations with the other accounts. I don’t even have enough time to use my account, then how can I use other account. What can I do now? I am not familiar with these technical side. You are the only one who can help me out now as you’re my mentor. I tried to send you a message on talk page but I can only edit my talk page. That’s why I am mentioning you here. Please take a look to my query.

I am confident that this is a mistake, I swear. You can check my details. I am getting loved and learned Wikipedia, but this disappointing me. Ameer al safar (talk) 11:47, 22 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

According to the notice above, it is Checkuser confirmed. You'd have to ask @Girth Summit who blocked you. You can try to appeal the block, but unless you have a strong reason, I doubt you'll be unblocked. — Qwerfjkl talk 12:53, 22 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I wouldn't call it confirmed - this is more

Likely territory. What tipped me over the edge into blocking was the fact that this account and the sock accounts have edited many of the same articles - in addition to the publicly viewable overlap, there are another five or so deleted articles where they have overlapped. Any unblock request is going to have to explain convincingly how there can be two people, who apparently don't know one another, but they edit from the same IP addresses, and coincidentally edit the same articles. Girth Summit _(blether) 16:15, 22 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Nalla Samayam film poster.jpg[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Nalla Samayam film poster.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. MrLinkinPark333 (talk) 20:19, 22 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Ameer al safar (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Requesting to get me unblocked because I’m not associated with any abusement in Wikipedia rather than editing and creating articles. This is strange that I got blocked without doing anything wrong. I don’t have any other accounts. Only this is my account and I am able to send my personal things like ID cards and location details. I think you blocked me by mistake. Please check me again. So you can clarify I think. I’m not an abuser. Before I do anything new, I seek help from my mentor who I requested help first after found I am blocked. Please check the above conversations. I also requesting to undelete my works, that I spent a lot of time to learn and create. Ameer al safar (talk) 14:34, 24 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

This does not explain why multiple accounts from the same IP address are editing the same articles. Yamla (talk) 16:11, 24 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Note to reviewing CU - there are some notes about the connection at the SPI case, and on cuwiki. Girth Summit _(blether) 14:44, 24 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Ayisha 2022 film.jpg[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Ayisha 2022 film.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:04, 24 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Gila Malayalam film poster.jpg[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Gila Malayalam film poster.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:14, 24 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Poovan film first look poster.jpg[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Poovan film first look poster.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:29, 24 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Saturday Night Malayalam film poster.jpg[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Saturday Night Malayalam film poster.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:34, 24 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@user:Yamla I don’t know why you all asking about this, I don’t know. How can I know ? I still stick on the same that I don’t know why they edit my articles. You can please ask them about them instead. And why blocking me when they edit my articles. You should block them instead! Please help me @User:Qwerfjkl. I’m not associated with any abusement and I don’t know why asking about other accounts. Please reinvestigate this case. Where can I get the justice for this? Ameer al safar (talk) 16:07, 27 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Ameer al safar (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Sorry for the late reply because I was learning why you guys are meaning and what is happening. Now I got to understand little bit that I am blocked for suspecting someone else’s fake account. As per @user:Grithsummit, I am blocked as I am overlapped with same interest in editing same articles. But this is so disappointing that the there are 5 same articles that I am commited editing with other two accounts that you are suspected that my multiple accounts. He shared this link : https://sigma.toolforge.org/editorinteract.py?users=Rihaan+M&users=CallistoR7&users=Ameer+al+safar&startdate=&enddate=&ns=&server=enwiki Commonly edited articles are 1. Palthu Janwar The article that was created by me and later updated so much contents by many people. They are not my accounts. Also why do I need another to add more content to my article? If anything I need to add I won’t even edit without login, I login everytime to claim the credit of the edit to my account. 2. Cadaver (2022 film) I have edited only one edit to this article, just to link the article Sreejith Sarang which was also created by me. Because when reviewer reviews my articles, they mention that there is no internal links to the article. So I do link my new article to the appropriate other articles. 3. Kumari (2022 film) The same instance, Just edited only one edit to link the article Sreejith Sarang 4. Mafia: Chapter 1 Here also same, only one edit done to link the same article Sreejith Sarang 5. Jana Gana Mana (2022 film) Again same, the only one edit to link the same article Sreejith Sarang This was the reason that led you to block me as an abuser? Getting emotional that the articles I have done are deleted also. So unhappy and such a bad experience for me as a new comer Wikipedian. I edit only my articles, If I edited the articles which I am not created. That was definitely because it was needed like linking or mentioning my articles to other articles. Also there is not only me who is interested in editing film related articles. I request Wikipedia to to unblock my account and also please check the edits properly before block someone. So sad that you aren’t even check the what are the edits I have done to the articles. Also it is more painful than block that deleting the articles created that took too much time in my leisure time from work. I am not much experienced in Wikipedia I understand and I don’t understand all the things you are telling technically. You can ask the other accounts that Ameer Al Safar is their fake account. This is the only one account I am using. Requesting other big editors to review my request seriously and take action appropriately. I don’t know how to prove my side. Helpless. Help me @user:Qwerfjkl mentor. Ameer al safar (talk) 17:12, 27 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

When you engage in promotional editing with all the signs of unpaid editing, and ultimately get caught up in a block for abuse of multiple acocunts because you are making the same edits as other promo/UPE accounts from the same ISP/IP ranges, administrators are not going to unblock you. I can look at your first handful of edits and there is zero doubt that you are engaging in promotion contrary to our policies and Terms of Use. Ponyo^{bons mots} 17:24, 27 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.