User talk:AnnaABrown
Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (May 8)
[edit]Please read the comments left by the reviewer on your submission. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
- If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at User:AnnaABrown/sandbox.
- To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
- If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, or on the .
contributions to Wikipedia!
- Please remember to link to the submission!
- You can also get real-time chat help from experienced editors.
Your submission at Articles for creation: International Test Commission (July 14)
[edit]Please read the comments left by the reviewer on your submission. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
- If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Draft:International Test Commission.
- To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
- If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
contributions to Wikipedia!
- You can also get real-time chat help from experienced editors.
Hello! AnnaABrown,
I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering or curious about why your article submission was declined please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Chris Troutman (talk) 16:25, 14 July 2014 (UTC)
|
Welcome to Wikipedia!!!
[edit]
|
Chris Troutman (talk) 16:27, 14 July 2014 (UTC)
Decline
[edit]To head off any questions, I'd like to explain that I declined your submission because it lacks sources that are independent of the subject and does not appear to be notable. Wikipedia cannot take the word of a subject for referencing about same and outside sources are needed to prove the subject is notable. My oversimplified rule of thumb is: if it wasn't discussed in The New York Times, it's not notable. Please read our specific criteria to understand the bar this draft has to pass. Chris Troutman (talk) 16:33, 14 July 2014 (UTC)