User talk:Anonymous 3658
February 2018
[edit]
Your recent edits could give Wikipedia contributors the impression that you may consider legal or other "off-wiki" action against them, or against Wikipedia itself. Please note that making such threats on Wikipedia is strictly prohibited under Wikipedia's policies on legal threats and civility. Users who make such threats may be blocked. If you have a dispute with the content of any page on Wikipedia, please follow the proper channels for dispute resolution. Please be sure to comment on content, not contributors, and where possible make specific suggestions for changes supported by reliable independent sources and focusing especially on verifiable errors of fact. Thank you. NeilN talk to me 16:26, 5 February 2018 (UTC)
Please note that "Investigations into any and all accusations made against someone must be conducted by police before trying to make it fact in a biography. Failure to do so is defamation and a criminal offence" is completely wrong and another attempt to intimidate other editors using the same tactic will result in an indefinite block. --NeilN talk to me 16:30, 5 February 2018 (UTC)
Hello, I'm Acebulf. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —specifically this edit to Quentin Tarantino— because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Acebulf (talk) 04:16, 27 February 2018 (UTC)
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Quentin Tarantino. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 04:17, 27 February 2018 (UTC)
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 04:39, 27 February 2018 (UTC)