User talk:Anti-racism juournalist

August 2021

Please do not add commentary, your own point of view, or your own personal analysis to Wikipedia articles, as you did to List of universities in Canada. Doing so violates Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. POV and most definitely not WP:MINOR Meters (talk) 09:20, 16 August 2021 (UTC)

That does not belong in that article, it is not properly sourced, it is not neutral, it is poorly written, and it is not a minor edit. And if you were actually a journalist you would probably know all of that, and how to spell "journalist". Meters (talk) 09:48, 16 August 2021 (UTC)

Your commnents are fully racist, and "juournalist" is just a typo, it's clear to everyone supporting the anti-racism cause. All the rest of your comments is a pure lie: my ad is well-sourced (referring to a mainstream Canadian newspaper and the official materials of the Superior Court of Justice in Toronto), neutral and well-written. Please stop your racist vandalism that violates Wikipedia's policy and "breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia". — Preceding unsigned comment added by Anti-racism juournalist (talk • contribs) 10:38, August 16, 2021 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at List of universities in Canada, you may be blocked from editing. Roxy the grumpy dog. wooF 12:35, 16 August 2021 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you make personal attacks on other people, as you did at User talk:Anti-racism juournalist. Comment on content, not on fellow editors. Calling my edit "racist vandalism" is a personal attack. Meters (talk) 16:27, 16 August 2021 (UTC)

thread started by latest sock: personal attacks, legal threat, etc

I didn't attack you personally, but exclusively the policy of systematically and unconditionally (with no discussion) blocking everything related to racist issues that is a racism itself. The political climate in the USA has changed a lot since the beginning of this year, and the society inclines not to tolerate any kind of systematic racism any more (including anti-Black racism which is one of the central issues of my Wikipedia ad). As the matter of my ad concerns a great portion of the US and Canadian populations (up to 40% in the US and over 50% in Canada), I seriously weigh up the option to apply to a US court against the Canadian department/branch of the Wikipedia with the only request (with no financial compensation claimed) to get a court permission for publishing there a story related to this lawsuit which is on behalf of all the racialized people of North America. Such an application and new lawsuit would make much more people around the globe know about the case (and I would get, accordingly, much more support of the general public) than any Wikipedia ad. Notice you, I don't threaten with a lawsuit, I just consider such an option independently on whether you're going to ban this Wikipedia account (what, I suppose, is going to happen anyhow). — Preceding unsigned comment added by Anti-racism juournalist (talk • contribs) 18:17, August 16, 2021 (UTC) Please sign your talk page posts. You wrote "Please stop your racist vandalism". That is a personal attack directed at me. And "I seriously weigh up the option to apply to a US court against the Canadian department/branch of the Wikipedia" does indeed appear to be a legal threat, or at least to have a chilling effect. Please read WP:NLT. I suggest that you remove that or clarify that you are not going to sue Wikipedia, before you are blocked. You can pursue legal matters against Wikipedia if you wish, but you cannot be a Wikipedia editor at the same time. Meters (talk) 18:30, 16 August 2021 (UTC) anti-Racism juournalist "it is poorly written" -- that is a personal attack directed at me (because it's about the ad I wrote). "If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at List of universities in Canada, you may be blocked from editing" -- that is a personal attack directed at me (is writing an ad about racism a kind of vandalism???) I protest against a discrminative use of the Wikipedia's policy when some users (Wikipedia administrators) can personally attack others, while being protected from blocking for violating this rule. My associates have a right to sue certain groups of people working for the Wikipedia, while some other associates will continue to edit the Wikipedia. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Anti-racism juournalist (talk • contribs) 19:47, August 16, 2021 (UTC) Again, please sign and indent your talk page posts. No, pointing out that an edit was poorly written is not a personal attack. It is simply a comment on the quality of the writing. The templated vandalism waning (given by user:Roxy the dog rather than me) is not a personal attack either. I am not an admin, and have not claimed to be one. Roxy the dog is not an admin and has not claimed to be one. You said I seriously weigh up the option to apply to a US court against the Canadian department/branch of the Wikipedia. That's you, not "other associates". It does not matter if you get someone else to do it, you still appear to be threatening legal action against Wikipedia. Again, please retract what I see as a legal threat. And user accounts are for individuals. You may not share your account. Meters (talk) 20:21, 16 August 2021 (UTC) Please do not modify posts that have already been replied to without indicating that it is a subsequent change. See WP:TALK#REPLIED on how to do this. Meters (talk) 20:27, 16 August 2021 (UTC) Once again, I protest against a discriminative use of the Wikipedia's policy when certain users (who, moreover, are not admins -- according to what you claim) are given the power to judge whether some other users follow the Wikipedia's policy or not -- and then those other users (especially those writing about racism) are blocked with no further discussion. The anti-racist policy of the US President Joe Biden won't allow to mock the very idea of fighting racism in all levels, of all forms. The story I told the world through my Wikipedia ad is too serious to play any games -- notice you, having read that, you can't claim I meant any precise individual. The USA is a great country that won't allow a horror story that happened in North America to remain covered up. anti-racism juournalist Just commenting for the record; I've been on this project for more than ten years and I have never directly asked an admin to sanction an individual editor for their poor behaviour. I may make an exception for you. This is a community driven project, and the community will not accept your unconsionable behaviour. Please stop. Thanks. -Roxy the grumpy dog. wooF 05:23, 17 August 2021 (UTC) And something more concerning insults in the Wikipedia. I cite the history page ( https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=List_of_universities_in_Canada&action=history ) of the List of universities in Canada: (cur | prev) 12:29, 14 August 2020‎ Roxy the dog talk contribs‎ 83,144 bytes −1,374‎ Reverted to revision 972145373 by LuK3 (talk): Bullshit addition (TW) (undo | thank) Tag: Undo (cur | prev) 12:03, 14 August 2020‎ International anti-racism journalist talk contribs‎ m 84,518 bytes +1,374‎ Racism in the universities of Ontario. This editing refers to such reliable sources as publications in mass media and an official lawsuit documentation of the Superior Court of Justice in Toronto, hence removing it contradicts the Wikipedia's regulations and the motto "Black Lives Matter". Therefore, if removed, it will be published anyhow in many other Wikipedia pages (undo | thank) (cur | prev) 12:16, 10 August 2020‎ LuK3 talk contribs‎ 83,144 bytes −1,352‎ Reverted good faith edits by International anti-racism journalist (talk): Entering WP:COATRACK territory, perhaps Higher education in Canada#Selected issues would be better for this info (TW) undothank Tag: Undo (cur | prev) 12:10, 10 August 2020‎ International anti-racism journalist talk contribs‎ m 84,496 bytes +1,352‎ racism in the universities of Ontario (undo | thank) "Bullshit addition" ! It means nothing else but a DIRECT PUBLIC INSULT of all the racialized (and, first of all, black) people of the USA and Canada. Isn't it a pure racism that still remains unblocked in the Wikipedia??? I may also officially ask an admin to sanction an individual editor for a poor behaviour contradicting the Wikipedia's rules and anti-racist laws, please stop removing from the Wikipedia any information related to racist issues in the Canadian universities. The community won't tolerate it. anti-racism juournalist Roxy the dog No need for an ANI. I've just found Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Israeli Rabbi. Quack. Reported. Meters (talk) 07:36, 17 August 2021 (UTC) I appeal to the Wikipedia's authorities: a user (Roxy the dog) who insulted the motto "Black Lives Matter" by calling it "bullshit" in the history page for List of universities in Canada (as shown above) asked to block another user who protects and defends this motto and fighting racism. Apart from being a direct personal attack forbidden in the Wikipedia, it offends all the black and racialized people in North America and, generally, in the world. I ask the Wikipedia's authorities to regulate it in accordance with the Wikipedia's anti-discrimination rules and the US, Canadian and international anti-racist laws. anti-racism juournalist

Blocked as a sockpuppet

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts as a sockpuppet of User:Israeli Rabbi per the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Israeli Rabbi. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  -- RoySmith (talk) 00:12, 18 August 2021 (UTC)