User talk:Anydesk

Welcome!

Hello, Anydesk, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as Gauranga Technologies, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's content policies and may not be retained. In short, the topic of an article must be notable and have already been the subject of publication by reliable and independent sources.

Please review Your first article for an overview of the article creation process. The Article Wizard is available to help you create an article, where it will be reviewed and considered for publication. For information on how to request a new article that can be created by someone else, see Requested articles. If you are stuck, come to the Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can help you through the processes.

New to Wikipedia? Please consider taking a look at our introductory tutorial or reviewing the contributing to Wikipedia page to learn the basics about editing. Below are a few other good pages about article creation.

Article development
Standard layout
Lead section
The perfect article
Task Center – need some ideas of what kind of things need doing? Go here.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, ask me on my talk page. You can also type {{help me}} on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! 331dot (talk) 09:55, 17 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Gauranga Technologies

If this was the first article that you created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

The page Gauranga Technologies has been speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This was done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seemed to be unambiguous advertising which only promoted a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to have been fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

Please do not recreate the material without addressing these concerns, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If you think this page should not have been deleted for this reason, or you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. 331dot (talk) 09:55, 17 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

April 2023

Hello Anydesk. The nature of your edits gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially serious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat search-engine optimization.

Paid advocates are very strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists. If the article does not exist, paid advocates are extremely strongly discouraged from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:Anydesk. The template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=Anydesk|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message. 331dot (talk) 09:56, 17 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello,

I think you have mistaken, i have not been paid. I have collected the content available on the internet and edited to create the article. I have also added the references of websites in which the content has already been published. Anydesk (talk) 10:48, 17 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You gamed the system and made precisely 10 edits and waited precisely four days to get autoconfirmed so you could directly create an article about a company which was highly promotional. The system exists for a reason. Are you saying that you have no affiliation with this company? 331dot (talk) 10:56, 17 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Ok. I am associated with the company. Where should i disclose? Should i create the article again with disclosure or is there anyway? Anydesk (talk) 11:23, 17 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You should disclose on your user page. If you are employed by the company either as an employee or as a third party, that counts as paid editing, you do not need to be specifically paid to edit. Please see WP:PAID for instructions. Please also read conflict of interest.

Wikipedia is not a place for companies to tell the world about themselves and what they do. Wikipedia articles about companies must summarize what independent reliable sources with significant coverage have chosen on their own to say about the company, showing how it meets the special Wikipedia definition of a notable company. Ideally, articles are written by independent editors wholly unconnected with the topic. If you still wish to proceed, you will need to submit a draft via Articles for creation for review by independent editors. You will first need to gather independent reliable sources with significant coverage of the company that describe its importance/significance/influence. These should not be staff interviews, press releases, brief mentions, announcements of routine business activities or other primary sources. Do you have at least three such sources? 331dot (talk) 11:48, 17 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]