Image copyright problem with Image:MyF1456.JPG
Thank you for uploading Image:MyF1456.JPG. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.
If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 17:17, 14 February 2008 (UTC)
Hello ApsbaMd2 - your edits seem to be ruffling a few feathers lately. Looking them over, I do agree that some (although not all) of the vandalism warnings you've been giving out have been real head-scratchers. Is there anything I can help you with? Sarcasticidealist (talk) 22:55, 14 February 2008 (UTC)
Re: Brad Pitt
Hi, sorry I didn't understand what you meant. Yes I was reverting 220.127.116.11's contribs. I admit I didn't check the other edits to the page. Did I break something? -- lucasbfr talk 16:34, 19 February 2008 (UTC)
Please remain civil
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, we would like to remind you not to attack other editors, as you did on User_talk:18.104.22.168. Please comment on the contributions and not the contributors. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Enigma msg! 22:52, 19 February 2008 (UTC)
Bonjour ApsbaMd2, recently, you reverted User:The Video Game Master's legitimate edit. His edit gave a correct spelling to an existing article, and you reverted it to an improper spelling and redlink. Then you posted on his wall that he should have included an edit summary. It is definitely good behaviour to use edit summaries, but the simple lack of an edit summary is not a good indication of vandalism. Reverting a good change is definitely worse behaviour than forgetting an edit summary. Please take a little more time to examine edits before reverting. - TheMightyQuill (talk) 16:07, 25 February 2008 (UTC)
Usually, the simplest way to get them is when you see one of interest on a user page, "edit this page" and copy the code that creates it. That code is usually self-explanatory with the text it carries, but it's a good idea to remember a few nearby landmarks on the page.