User talk:Archanine

Welcome!

Hello, Archanine, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or click here to ask for help here on your talk page and a volunteer will visit you here shortly. Again, welcome! IEditEncyclopedia (talk) 02:41, 13 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion

Sorry I meant TatanyaGolding/WPT to be a user page but for some reason it doesn't have the "User:" prefix after I created it ? Just a list of articles I want to work on. --TatanyaGolding (talk) 23:28, 26 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

January 2015

Hello Archanine. Thanks for patrolling new pages – it's a very important task! I'm just letting you know, however, that you shouldn't tag pages as lacking context (CSD A1), or content (CSD A3), moments after they are created, as you did at Plaza 8. It's best to wait at least 10–15 minutes for more content to be added if the page is very short, and the articles should not be marked as patrolled. Tagging such pages in a very short space of time may drive away well-meaning contributors, which is not good for Wikipedia. Attack pages (G10), blatant nonsense (G1), copyright violations (G12) and pure vandalism/blatant hoaxes (G3) should of course be tagged and deleted immediately. Thanks. -War wizard90 (talk) 02:37, 27 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Angry Engineers Entertainment.

Hey, thanks for patrolling and tagging pages for deletion, but you really need to give pages more time to develop prior to tagging them. Angry Engineers Entertainment was tagged for deletion three minutes after creation, that really isn't enough time to start a new article, in particular for a new user. I would say at least 15-30 minutes for articles that are not blatantly hoaxes, vandalism, or clearly not notable (like someone writing about their high school friend, for example). Early tagging of articles about subjects that may actually be notable actually harms the project, as it may prevent a notable topic from being created, and it may turn away new editors. Cheers, --kelapstick^(bainuu) 02:06, 5 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy Deletion request of Revant Optics page

Hey Archanine, thanks a ton for all the feedback! I'd love to hear any specific feedback you have in terms of making this article seem less promotional. I gave my best attempt at creating and encyclopedia based page with as many sources as possible. I had no intention of using that page to promote Revant Optics, moreso educate the community about a local business in the nearby area. Thanks in advance! Wikkicontrib (talk) 20:40, 16 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I'm quite sorry about falsely tagging your page. If you want your page to be better, check out WP:NPOV Archanine (talk) 20:48, 16 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Aaaaaaa listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Aaaaaaa. Since you had some involvement with the Aaaaaaa redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Vincent60030 (talk) 11:08, 19 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Everypony listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Everypony. Since you had some involvement with the Everypony redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Steel1943 (talk) 15:01, 23 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Half-Life 4 listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Half-Life 4. Since you had some involvement with the Half-Life 4 redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Steel1943 (talk) 15:04, 23 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Is Santa real listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Is Santa real. Since you had some involvement with the Is Santa real redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Steel1943 (talk) 15:13, 23 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This article does not exist listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect This article does not exist. Since you had some involvement with the This article does not exist redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Steel1943 (talk) 15:16, 23 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Command block listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Command block. Since you had some involvement with the Command block redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Steel1943 (talk) 15:19, 23 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Microsoft 10 listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Microsoft 10. Since you had some involvement with the Microsoft 10 redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Steel1943 (talk) 15:34, 23 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

List of dictators listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect List of dictators. Since you had some involvement with the List of dictators redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Steel1943 (talk) 15:37, 23 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

List of modern dictators listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect List of modern dictators. Since you had some involvement with the List of modern dictators redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Steel1943 (talk) 15:39, 23 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Dedotated wam listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Dedotated wam. Since you had some involvement with the Dedotated wam redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Steel1943 (talk) 15:44, 23 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Loomynarty listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Loomynarty. Since you had some involvement with the Loomynarty redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Steel1943 (talk) 16:49, 23 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Rekt listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Rekt. Since you had some involvement with the Rekt redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Steel1943 (talk) 16:57, 23 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

12345678 listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect 12345678. Since you had some involvement with the 12345678 redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. -- Tavix ^(talk) 21:13, 14 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

1234567 listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect 1234567. Since you had some involvement with the 1234567 redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. -- Tavix ^(talk) 21:14, 14 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy Deletion listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Speedy Deletion. Since you had some involvement with the Speedy Deletion redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. - Champion (talk) (contribs) (Formerly TheChampionMan1234) 01:24, 29 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

3.141592653589793238462 listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect 3.141592653589793238462. Since you had some involvement with the 3.141592653589793238462 redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Mr. Guye (talk) 22:41, 31 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Montage parody listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Montage parody. Since you had some involvement with the Montage parody redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Thankful for cooperation, thankful for Wikipedia, Gaioa (click to talk) 10:08, 21 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Aaaaaaaaaaaaaa listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Aaaaaaaaaaaaaa. Since you had some involvement with the Aaaaaaaaaaaaaa redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. TL22 (talk) 20:51, 29 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

"Wwwww" listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Wwwww. Since you had some involvement with the Wwwww redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. Invalid^OS (talk) 16:56, 18 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

"Minecraft 1.8.3" listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Minecraft 1.8.3. Since you had some involvement with the Minecraft 1.8.3 redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. Nixinova T C 20:28, 19 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

"Fus Roh Dah" listed at Redirects for discussion

A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Fus Roh Dah. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 January 30#Fus Roh Dah until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. 𝟙𝟤𝟯𝟺𝐪𝑤𝒆𝓇𝟷𝟮𝟥𝟜𝓺𝔴𝕖𝖗𝟰 (𝗍𝗮𝘭𝙠) 23:51, 30 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

"5naf" listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect 5naf and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 October 11#5naf until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Pizzaplayer219^Talk_Contribs 12:29, 11 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]