User talk:Arencher
Image:Victorio.jpg listed for deletion
[edit]Admrboltz (T | C) 19:45, 16 January 2006 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of Chelonaphobia
[edit]If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
A tag has been placed on Chelonaphobia requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about something invented/coined/discovered by the article's creator or someone they know personally, and it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here. Alex discussion ★ 19:45, 26 December 2013 (UTC)
Chelonaphobia moved to Draft:Chelonaphobia
[edit]Thank you for helping to build Wikipedia. Unfortunately, this may not be strong enough a topic for an article. It may be only a dictionary definition. I've moved it to Draft space so that you can add content and sourcing so as to ready it for a return to Article space. See template message that follows for more info about article requirements on Wikipedia. Thanks. Dlohcierekim 22:00, 26 December 2013 (UTC)
Thank you for helping to build Wikipedia. Please help us by improving this article:
- Articles require
- significant coverage
- in reliable sources
- that are independent of the subject.
- Significant coverage
- We need references that discuss the subject – directly, in detail. Not just passing mentions, directory listings, or any old thing that happens to have the name in it. And we need several references - not just one. These sources show that the subject is notable.
- Reliable sources
- We need sources generally trusted to tell the truth. Major newspapers. Factual, widely-published books. Or other high-quality mainstream publications which are careful about fact-checking and accuracy. Not: forums, fansites, MySpace, Facebook, or most blogs. Good sources make the text verifiable.
- Independent
- Nothing written by the subject or paid for by the subject. Not their website. Not a press release. Primary sources aren't enough: we require something independent.
A useful search tool--Wikipedia Reference Search
Possibly unfree File:Doc.jpg
[edit]A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Doc.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you object to the listing for any reason. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 17:15, 22 March 2015 (UTC)
MfD nomination of Draft:Chelonaphobia
[edit]Draft:Chelonaphobia, a page you substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Draft:Chelonaphobia and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of Draft:Chelonaphobia during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Ricky81682 (talk) 04:39, 17 November 2015 (UTC)