User talk:Artisticresearch

Your submission at Articles for creation: Jason Pine (February 26)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by DoubleGrazing were:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Completely unreferenced.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Jason Pine and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

DoubleGrazing (talk) 13:37, 26 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Artisticresearch! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! DoubleGrazing (talk) 13:37, 26 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Jason Pine (February 26)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by TheBritinator was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Marginally improved from last review. Still significantly lacks reliable citation.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Jason Pine and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

TheBritinator (talk) 16:01, 26 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Jason Pine (February 27)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Utopes were:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

This submission does not appear to be written in the formal tone expected of an encyclopedia article. Entries should be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources. Please rewrite your submission in a more encyclopedic format. Please make sure to avoid peacock terms that promote the subject.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Jason Pine and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Utopes _{(talk / cont)} 17:37, 27 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Jason Pine has a new comment[edit]

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Jason Pine. Thanks! Utopes _{(talk / cont)} 19:45, 27 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Jason Pine is a Berlin Prize-winning writer and anthropologist, and serves as a full professor at the State University of New York. His distinguished career and contributions to the field of anthropology are well-documented through numerous secondary sources, underlining his fulfillment of Wikipedia's notability criteria. Pine's work, which spans ethnography, cultural analysis, and the study of socio-economic dynamics, has garnered recognition for its depth and impact. I really don't understand what is the problem as much less noteworthy people has pages. Thank you. Artistic Research (talk) 22:10, 27 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Jason Pine (February 27)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Theroadislong was:

This submission does not appear to be written in the formal tone expected of an encyclopedia article. Entries should be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources. Please rewrite your submission in a more encyclopedic format. Please make sure to avoid peacock terms that promote the subject.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Jason Pine and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Theroadislong (talk) 22:14, 27 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you - I edited the whole article for neutrality and provided secondary sources. Artistic Research (talk) 22:18, 27 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You didn't- the article is still written completely inappropriately. Qcne (talk) 11:30, 28 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Jason Pine has a new comment[edit]

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Jason Pine. Thanks! Theroadislong (talk) 22:23, 27 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I cleaned the article considerably. Thank you. Artistic Research (talk) 22:46, 27 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Jason Pine has a new comment[edit]

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Jason Pine. Thanks! Theroadislong (talk) 07:25, 28 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Jason Pine (February 28)[edit]

Your recent article submission has been rejected. If you have further questions, you can ask at the Articles for creation help desk or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help. The reason left by Qcne was: This submission is contrary to the purpose of Wikipedia. The comment the reviewer left was: I'm rejecting this draft (which means you can not re-submit it) because yet again the language throughout is still wholly unacceptable for a neutral encyclopaedia. Jason may indeed meet our notability criteria, but unless you carefully learn how to write for this encyclopaedia it is pointless to keep submitting this in it's present state and continue to waste our time.

If you feel you can write in a dry, neutral, factual manner and have improved the draft, let me know on my user talk page or WP:PING me.

Qcne (talk) 11:29, 28 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]