User talk:AubreyCooks

Welcome![edit]

Hello, AubreyCooks, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

You may also want to take the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit The Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! Blythwood (talk) 21:16, 1 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia![edit]

Hello, welcome to Wikipedia!

I notice that your edits have been on the topic of Flybridge Capital Partners. If you are connected with this company, can you fill out a disclosure statement, explaining your connection to the company? Thanks. (Listing a work email address or contact number would be really nice so you can be reached if necessary too, not essential but maybe good if you don't plan to look at this page often.) Let me know if any questions. Blythwood (talk) 21:19, 1 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

February 2023[edit]

Hello AubreyCooks. The nature of your edits, such as the one you made to Silversmith Capital Partners, gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially serious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat search-engine optimization.

Paid advocates are very strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists. If the article does not exist, paid advocates are extremely strongly discouraged from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:AubreyCooks. The template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=AubreyCooks|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message. scope_creep^Talk 23:30, 2 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]