User talk:AugustAugust

Style

As a matter of style on the soap opera pages, children are not added to the bullet point lists until after they are born. While there is no dispute that Sami Brady is expecting, there are no names and at this point there is no guarantee the children will be born alive. Anything can happen that's why children are not added to bullet point lists until after their birth. Please do not participate in an edit war by adding information not to be included in a page.IrishLass0128 16:47, 19 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Again, it is a matter of MOS Style for Soap Opera pages that you do not include children until after they are born. It is that way throughout the soaps. Unborn and miscarried children are not added. This is a style decision, not a peronal decision. You can continue to add them, but they will be removed. If you continue to go against the style set forth by Wikipedia, you can be blocked from editing. Adding content deemed not appropriate or against the MOS is grounds for reporting your account. Participation in edit wars, that you've obviously declared, is further reason to report your account. To sign your messages you leave to other people use four ~ marks. IrishLass0128 17:02, 19 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Edit war

IrishLass0128 asked me to take a look at an exchange between the two of you on her talk page where you asked her not to undo edits you had made, edits that went against accepted practices in articles about soap opera characters.

I realize you're very new here, and so I will ask that:

you familiarize yourself with the standards for soap opera characters before making any more edits, and also read about consensus and how important it is to Wikipedia. Given the permutations and fluctuations of soap opera storylines, including anything and everything about a character would result in many articles about those characters becoming indiscriminate collections of information, which we don't want. There are cutoffs for what information is important enough for everything, and in soap operas the project has decided not to list expected children because the writers frequently still or miscarry them (see also the Wikipedia is not a crystal ball page — so many things are planned that do not come to fruition that we can't possibly have articles about future things unless they are very likely to happen, and soap opera children do not quite make that cut).

you refrain from further reverts of her reverts of your edits, or anyone else's. If you do this more than three times in 24 hours you will be blocked from editing for a while. This is an ironclad rule here. You can also be blocked if you make just three reverts a day over a period of several days ... we enforce the spirit of that rule as much as its letter.

I would strongly suggest that, until you are fully conversant with the character guidelines, you refrain making edits such as the ones you have been making and stay with safe edits such as some you have made to other articles. You can always feel free to correct a spelling or grammatical error. If you really think you can't edit soap articles within the limits set by the project, consider editing other articles about things you might have some knowledge about, like the town you live in or your favorite food.

Good luck. We always hold out hope that every new editor can become a valuable contributor to Wikipedia. Daniel Case 18:56, 19 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

IrishLass asked me to do this and talk to you. As an administrator, it's part of my duties here to intervene when asked by another user. Daniel Case 15:35, 20 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent edits

Hi, there. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. On many keyboards, the tilde is entered by holding the Shift key, and pressing the key with the tilde pictured. You may also click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your name and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you! --SineBot 09:15, 20 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Vandalism Warning

Your recent moves over consensus decisions is considered vandalism. I will be reporting all your moves and having them moved back especially the Sami Brady move. It has been decided on the soaps, all soaps, that characters will stay their maiden names. Do not continue to violate the MOS by moving these pages. CelticGreen 18:06, 23 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

To further clarify on what CelticGreen means about names, the article's title about the character, man or woman, should be their common name. That applies to articles on real-life people on Wikipedia as well. If the woman's married last name is a part of her common name, then her article should go by that last name as well, of course. For instance, fictional character Kendall Hart is now commonly known as Kendall Hart Slater (both Kendall Hart and Kendall Hart Slater are a common name for her), even though she's been married to Zach Slater for not more than three years yet. There is also the more important fact that she often refers to herself as Kendall Hart Slater, which is most likely what made that name, with Slater tagged onto it, so common. Anyway, I'll see you around. Take care. Flyer22 20:00, 23 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Even though my talk page says that I'll respond there, I'm letting you know that I responded there (on my talk page) to your comment to me about this matter. Flyer22 06:09, 24 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Flyer22 asked me to explain my opinion on the Theresa Lopez-Fitzgerals move from Crane. Not even NBC lists her as Crane in the credits or on their website. In the last three months she's been married to Jared Casey, Ethan Winthrop, and then back to Alistair Crane. Since NBC states she is just Lopez-Fitzgerald and that's what most people would look for when coming to Wikipedia, it makes sense for her to stay there and all her marriages can be listed in the character description.

Also, I noticed you have done a lot of moves that are not to character's common names to names that are their "married" name, Kimber Henry, Carrie Brady being a couple that stick with me right now. Just because a character gets married, doesn't mean we run and move their page. Wikipedia is for reference. If people can't find articles because of moves, it's not a very good tool.CelticGreen 01:39, 25 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

AugustAugust, try not to start up the moving of the woman's last name from her common name again. What the title of the woman's last name should be is her common name. If it's a famous real-life person choosing to go by her married name, then that's another matter.

I don't really watch the show that she's on, but Cassie Winslow is clearly better known with the Winslow in her name than as Cassie Lewis, thus her article is better-placed at Cassie Winslow Lewis than at Cassie Lewis, no matter what an official soap opera site titles her as. And, also, when listing the status within parentheses in the Family and relationships sections of soap opera character articles, make sure that you don't capitalize those instances...unless it's an official name or title such as...(child, by Todd Manning). I'll see you later. Flyer22 04:46, 5 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent edits

Hi, there. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. On many keyboards, the tilde is entered by holding the Shift key, and pressing the key with the tilde pictured. You may also click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your name and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you! --SineBot 05:32, 24 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright problems

Hello. Concerning your contribution, Edmund Winslow, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from either web sites or printed material without the permission of the author. This article or image appears to be a direct copy from http://www.soapcentral.com/gl/whoswho/edmund.php. As a copyright violation, Edmund Winslow appears to qualify for deletion under the speedy deletion criteria. Edmund Winslow has been tagged for deletion, and may have been deleted by the time you see this message. For text material, please consider rewriting the content and citing the source, provided that it is credible.

If you believe that the article or image is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under the GNU Free Documentation License (GFDL) then you should do one of the following:

If you have permission from the author, leave a message explaining the details at Talk:Edmund Winslow and send an email with the message to "permissions-en (at) wikimedia (dot) org". See Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for instructions.
If a note on the original website states that re-use is permitted under the GFDL or released into the public domain leave a note at Talk:Edmund Winslow with a link to where we can find that note.
If you own the copyright to the material: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en(at)wikimedia(dot)org or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the GFDL, and note that you have done so on Talk:Edmund Winslow.

However, for text content, you may want to consider rewriting the content in your own words. Thank you, and please feel free to continue contributing to Wikipedia. --stephenw32768^{<user page><talk>} 09:50, 27 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Your vandalism has been reported

You do NOT move pages to false names. You have been warned in the past. Do it again and you will be reported formally. Sami Brady's page is NOT to be moved. There is no evidence she has taken the name DiMera. IrishLass0128 18:32, 9 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

There is a report of this activity at ANI. Please ensure your actions arise from agreement and consensus among other editors. Take your ideas to the discussions pages before acting on them as this will decrease strife and drama. JodyB_{Roll, Tide, Roll} 19:43, 9 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Page moves

You have been repeatedly warned. Stop moving pages against consensus and Wikipedia guidelines. CelticGreen (talk) 17:56, 24 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Your move of the Carly Corinthos page has been reverted. Wikipedia has guidelines, please try and follow them and stop moving pages for no good reason. See [Wikipedia:Naming conventions (common names)]] if you have any questions. Further violations will be reported as vandalism. IrishLass (talk) 14:57, 14 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Why are you back to moving articles from their common names?

STOP IT! You know the deal by now about common names. I don't have to explain anything to you about that anymore. For a while...it seemed that you were following the rules about common names, but you aren't anymore. I'm not sure why you have started up this problem again, but you need to stop it soon. I will look to have you blocked, temporarily or permanently, if you continue on this route. Flyer22 (talk) 09:32, 23 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I've responded to your reply about this on my talk page. Try to remember to sign your user name when commenting/replying on Wikipedia talk pages, though. Flyer22 (talk) 08:50, 25 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent edits

Hi there. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. If you can't type the tilde character, you should click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your name and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you! --SineBot (talk) 09:07, 17 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

List of fictional supercouples

Do not add fake supercouples to this list. What you did, adding Leo du Pres and Greenlee Smythe to this list, by adding references for them that do not reference them at all and are instead being used to reference other couples as supercouples on this list, was flat-out wrong. Just sneaky deception all around. Do not try anything like that again. I most certainly cannot be fooled on this matter, especially since I gathered most of these references.

Only a valid reference calling Leo and Greenlee a supercouple would permit their inclusion on this list, of course. They were a popular couple, but not a supercouple. Flyer22 (talk) 05:20, 18 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Brooke and Ridge

Instead of attacking Flyer22, why don't you find the hundreds of sources for their article and write it. I'm sure that someone who is so ready to criticize would be willing to channel that negative energy into actual research and writing. Ani Mate 00:47, 19 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I was just giving you advice. If you want to be upset with Flyer22, or even with me, there's not a thing I can do to stop that. However, I did offer a way to solve your complaints. It involves you doing some actual research and writing of articles. Flyer22 has done that, and I have done that. It's just very hard to take a complaint seriously about an article not being here, when the person complaining seems to want others to do all the work so they can get their way.

However, by all means continue to complain. That's gonna do wonders getting referenced articlew about Brooke/Ridge and Sonny/Carly written. Ani Mate 01:39, 19 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

And yet again

Why do you keep doing this when you know the policy?! Common name! What, do you like taking breaks after being warned, and then starting up again? You know damn well that Meg Snyder did/does not belong at Meg Snyder Ryan, and other articles you recently moved do not belong where you moved them. I am very close to reporting you for this continued behavior. And instead of responding to me in some childish/angry way about this, I suggest you move those articles back.

I already took care of your Meg Snyder move. If you do not correct your wrong moves, I will. Flyer22 (talk) 23:07, 30 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

warned

You are getting reported for calling me jackass. One it is not right to do that. --M42380 (talk) 23:56, 25 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

you need to move on from your probelm with Carly Corinthos. --M42380 (talk) 23:13, 26 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Your behavior

You have been acting like a child for the last couple of days. --M42380 (talk) 01:42, 27 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Child behavior is amazing--M42380 (talk) 02:20, 29 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

You

One, stop coming to my talk page and harrsing me and rubbing stuff that you "claimed is right"
Second, I don't care about you
Third, I don't have to say that i am sorry
fourth, I am not a guy I am female.
final, Don't ever come on to my page again.

--M42380 (talk) 02:33, 29 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

LOL @ ABOVE....he wrong because he said Jax and Carly where divorced in 2008. Such a loser.

I AM NOT A GUY. I WAS NOT WRONG. I don't want to see your name anywhere any more. --M42380 (talk) 02:42, 29 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hey there August ... I know interactions between editors can be frustrating, but please consider your behavior more carefully. Other editors may be incorrect, stubborn, or argumentative, but that is never an excuse for uncivil behavior and personal attacks on your part. Your recent interactions with M42380 have been just that; "yelling" and taunting on her talk page and calling her a "loser" above are all completely inappropriate. I myself don't always agree with this editor, but the best and only way to deal with any disagreement over an article is calm discussion. If you find yourself in a situation where an "edit war" over a disputed fact is pending, start a larger discussion inviting others to participate and get some consensus either way rather than revert back and forth in violation of policy. And I would also point out that fighting and chancing getting blocked over something as unimportant as a soap opera character's name is just silly. Thanks for your consideration of my comments. — TAnthony^Talk 02:48, 29 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Well. well 2

Leave me alone. I am dealing with something else and I don't you to be part of my nightmare. --M42380 (talk) 20:03, 26 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Newman Enterprises

An editor has nominated one or more articles which you have created or worked on, for deletion. The nominated article is Newman Enterprises. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also Wikipedia:Notability and "What Wikipedia is not").

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion(s) by adding your comments to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Newman Enterprises. Please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~).

You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate.

Please note: This is an automatic notification by a bot. I have nothing to do with this article or the deletion nomination, and can't do anything about it. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 01:16, 26 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

March 2010

Please stop. If you continue to move pages to bad titles contrary to naming conventions or consensus, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. AniMate 16:55, 18 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Nicole Walker

Please do not change Nicole Walker to Nicole DiMera. Per WP:COMMONNAMES, it should be Walker. Rm994 (talk) 03:34, 22 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

June 2011

Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to contribute to the encyclopedia, but when you add or change content, as you did to the article Livia Frye, please cite a reliable source for the content of your edit. This helps maintain our policy of verifiability. See Wikipedia:Citing sources for how to cite sources, and the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. -- Donald Albury 12:25, 24 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Still moving articles

Why are you still moving articles in ways that go against WP:COMMONAME, after you've been warned repeatedly for doing so? Flyer22 (talk) 19:42, 24 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:34, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]