User talk:Augustogonzalezmor

El Líbero edit warring

Hello Augustogonzalezmor, you recently undid a revert I made to your edits on the El Líbero page. This is not acceptable. I realize that you are new on this platform, so please consider this a warning. If you disagree with another editor undoing your work, you must discuss it on the talk page, not revert, as this leads to edit warring. Revirvlkodlaku (talk) 02:25, 25 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Revirvlkodlaku. I live in Chile, Im a journalist and I have worked in multiple media outlets. All the information I put about El Líbero is true and was backed up with links from various reliable sources. Despite that, you decided to delete all my work with weak excuses. Do you know the importance in Chile of the National Press Association? You say there were weak references, to Twitter, for example. But that link you're referring led to the profile of a Pullitzer Prize winner. Does that seem like a weak reference to you? Instead, in your edition you leave references to fourth category leaflets that have no credibility in my country.

Much of the material you left behind is downright biased and contains flippant quotes. Also, you have incorrect information. For example, Patricio Navia is the main columnist for El Líbero and has written more than 800 articles for the newspaper. But you decide to delete it and leave other names of people who are not regular collaborators.

Im new in Wikipedia, Im interested in continuing to collaborate in editing articles related to my country and I apologize if I broke any code on this site. But you erased all my work! Augustogonzalezmor (talk) 00:50, 26 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Augustogonzalezmor, apologies for undoing your work; please know that it isn't personal. The reason I did so was that some of the references you added, including the one from Twitter, are not considered reliable, as I mentioned in my revert summary. It is likely that what you are saying is true, and I certainly don't know anything about the Chilean National Press Association, but that really isn't the point here. The point is that if you use unreliable sources to support your edits, your entire effort appears dubious to other editors. If you are able to support your edits with credible sources, please do so, and I will gladly defer to your expertise in this area. Thank you. Revirvlkodlaku (talk) 01:43, 26 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello friend, I just saw your answer. I think we should come to a common point, because that you left contains a lot of incorrect information and weak sources. From what I put, what things in your opinion do not contribute or are weak? Knowing that, I can make a correct edit. Greetings. Augustogonzalezmor (talk) 20:04, 30 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Well, I thought I had explained it in my previous comment. It is preferred that you not use sources that are not considered reliable, such as social media, primary sources (self-published content), etc. Please consult [[WP::Reliable sources]]. Thank you :) Revirvlkodlaku (talk) 04:43, 31 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, friend. I'm going to go back to the edit I made and delete the things that you say it's not appropriate to put. Greetings Augustogonzalezmor (talk) 17:35, 9 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, friend. I've already added a few things and didn't include the things you questioned above. Greetings Augustogonzalezmor (talk) 19:49, 9 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, I went ahead and copy-edited your work. You added all bare URLs, which I had to fix. Please try to reference correctly next time. I also replaced some content that you removed without explanation. Lastly, I removed the names of columnists that didn't have wikilinks or references. Revirvlkodlaku (talk) 23:12, 15 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome Augustogonzalezmor!

Hello Augustogonzalezmor. Welcome to Wikipedia and thank you for your contributions!

I'm Ad Orientem, one of the other editors here, and I hope you decide to stay and help contribute to this amazing repository of knowledge.

Some pages of helpful information to get you started:

Introduction to Wikipedia

The five pillars of Wikipedia

Editing tutorial

How to edit a page

Simplified Manual of Style

The basics of Wikicode

How to develop an article

How to create an article

Help pages

What Wikipedia is not

Some common sense Dos and Don'ts:

Do be bold

Do assume good faith

Do be civil

Do keep cool!

Do maintain a neutral point of view

Don't spam

Don't infringe copyright

Don't edit where you have a conflict of interest

Don't commit vandalism

Don't get blocked

If you need further help, you can:

Ask a question

or you can:

Get help at the Teahouse

or even:

Ask an experienced editor to "adopt" you

Alternatively, leave me a message at my talk page or type {{helpme}} here on your talk page and someone will try to help.

There are many ways you can contribute to Wikipedia. Here are a few ideas:

Fight vandalism

Be a WikiFairy or a WikiGnome

Help contribute to articles

Perform maintenance tasks

Become a member of a project that interests you

Help design new templates

Subscribe and contribute to The Signpost

Translate articles from Wikipedias in other languages

To get some practice editing you can use a sandbox. You can create your own personal sandbox for use any time. It's perfect for working on bigger projects. Then for easy access in the future, you can put {{My sandbox}} on your user page. By the way, seeing as you haven't created a user page yet, simply click here to start it.

Please remember to:

Always sign your posts on talk pages. You can do this either by clicking on the button on the edit toolbar or by typing four tildes ~~~~ at the end of your post. This will automatically insert your signature, a link to your talk page, and a timestamp.
Leave descriptive edit summaries for your edits. Doing so helps other editors understand what changes you have made and why you made them.

The best way to learn about something is to experience it. Explore, learn, contribute, and don't forget to have some fun!

Sincerely, Ad Orientem (talk) 03:07, 25 May 2022 (UTC) (Leave me a message)[reply]

Ad Orientem (talk) 03:07, 25 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

May 2022

Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit(s) you made to El Líbero, did not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use your sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. Ad Orientem (talk) 03:08, 25 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

June 2022

Hello, I'm Bedivere. Wikipedia is written by people who have a wide diversity of opinions, but we try hard to make sure articles have a neutral point of view. Your recent edit to El Líbero seemed less than neutral and has been removed. If you think this was a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Bedivere (talk) 04:44, 16 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Disruptive editing

Please stop your disruptive editing.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at El Líbero, you may be blocked from editing. Revirvlkodlaku (talk) 23:12, 27 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]