User talk:BARRY DOMINIC GRAHAM

George Beattie

Hello, when adding content to an article you should provide reliable sources to back up any claims. Using your personal webpage and your own original research as a source is not sufficient. Your contributions should be neutral as well, avoiding biased or promotional language. Please also use appropriate formatting and use breaks to avoid large blocks of text.--The Devil's Advocate _{tlk. cntrb.} 23:16, 23 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia: check out the Teahouse!

Hello! BARRY DOMINIC GRAHAM, you are invited to the Teahouse, a forum on Wikipedia for new editors to ask questions about editing Wikipedia, and get support from peers and experienced editors. Please join us! Arctic Kangaroo 15:57, 26 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Using caps lock

Hi Barry, when you type in Wikipedia, can you use small letters instead of caps? Typing in caps is considered shouting in Wikipedia, per WP:SHOUT. Thanks. Arctic Kangaroo 11:07, 4 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This includes edit summaries. "wiki suggested corrections" is easier to read. Thanks in advance. Apteva (talk) 21:59, 6 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for May 5

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

George Beattie (poet) (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added links pointing to Attorney, Radicalism, Waterloo and Freethinker

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 16:10, 5 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Beattie changes

Hello again, I saw some of the changes you made to the article and have a few concerns and addressed one of them myself. First off, you marked several major edits as minor. There are only certain instances when you should mark an edit as minor. Secondly, a lot of the material you added regarding his failed engagement to Miss William Gibson and subsequent suicide is unsourced and worded in a non-neutral fashion. You should clearly back this material with sourcing and change the wording to be more of an objective description.--The Devil's Advocate _{tlk. cntrb.} 20:52, 6 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there... just trying to figure out the process on Wiki. Thank you for all your assistance thus far. I must tell you that this Project myself and my co-researcher are working on (George Beattie), has unfortunately never been touched by anyone for 150 years and that no genuine research has, until now, ever been actually done. Thomas Henderson (1885) who has been given much credit on the Wiki page has merely written a short summary of the only biography of George Beattie ever written, with no research involved whatsoever, there are errors on the info of his link. The only biography, written by A.S. Mt. Cyrus is certainly not verifiable or totally reliable by any means, but it is the only one in existence, written 40 years after Beattie's death. My co-researcher and myself, because this subject is local to us and a profitless labour of love, have uncovered details and errors previously unearthed, by hard work in the National Archives of Scotland both online and on site in Edinburgh, at great personal expense, to ensure, for the first time, the most accurate information possible. I realise that my text may seem rather dramatic at times, but this is the nature of this story, which for some reason has been left to fade into oblivion. George Beattie was regarded by local journalists at the time of his death, to be the most popular and beloved man in the entire town of Montrose, but now, there is not a single plaque or rememberance of any kind there to the memory of his unusual benevolence and literary genius. All details and dramatic descriptions are sourced from the only biography in existence of George Beattie and all facts that I have provided are directly from the National Archives and can be fully verified. I sincerely hope that our work on this page is acceptable to Wiki, as not only does it mean a great deal to us to have the essence of his story captured as accurately as possible, but, I am 99.9% sure that no-one else will contribute a thing to this page, as I have discovered to my dismay, that we have been the only researchers to have ever seriously worked on this particular subject. We will be giving a few presentations to the local institutions of Montrose in September and need to be able to back up everything we have found as there has been, and is, a great deal of erroneous misinformation being accepted as fact due to the rarity of factual source material of which myself an co-researcher have been fortunate enough to be in the possession of. Thanks again for your guidance. Sincerely, Barry D. Graham.

Articles should not contain "dramatic descriptions" of a subject as that is not the purpose of Wikipedia. Content in the editorial voice should be written in a dispassionate tone.--The Devil's Advocate _{tlk. cntrb.} 16:45, 7 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for May 14

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited George Beattie (poet), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Scottish (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 15:34, 14 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:01, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, BARRY DOMINIC GRAHAM. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, BARRY DOMINIC GRAHAM. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]