User talk:Barnsey Boo

December 2009

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Future plc, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Stifle (talk) 09:17, 1 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Excuse me but which edit are you claiming by me in unconstructive. I've made 2 edits on Future plc. This one [1] and this one [2]. My only other contributions were reverting anonymous IP's who have been deleting parts of it without explanation. Ban them instead. Barnsey Boo (talk) 15:54, 2 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The readdition of the security codes for Future's buildings. Stifle (talk) 16:04, 2 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

You don't appear to have been welcomed yet, so here goes nothing

Welcome!

Hello, Barnsey Boo, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

The five pillars of Wikipedia
Tutorial
How to edit a page and How to develop articles
How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}} before the question. Again, welcome! -Phoenixrod (talk) 18:05, 13 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

thanx Phoenixrod

Blocked as a sock puppet

You have been blocked indefinitely as a sock puppet. (blocked by –MuZemike 21:43, 3 February 2010 (UTC))[reply]
You may contest this block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here}} below, but please read our guide to appealing blocks first.

As Confirmed by CheckUser. –MuZemike 21:43, 3 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Barnsey Boo (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

oooh. I fear we have a clash of IPs here. I am not a sockpuppet and not a disruptive editor either. I wonder if an admin can see his way clear to unblocking my band and I'd be 100% grateful. No abuse comes from here and I don't use other accounts. Barnsey Boo (talk) 23:09, 13 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

I've run the checkuser again, and the technical evidence is overwhelming. --jpgordon^{::==( o )} 23:54, 13 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

I'm not party to whatever evidence Checkuser shows up - however Barnsey Boo clearly works for one of our local corporates (as indeed did I at one time) and they have a firewall that will route a number of WP editors through the same tiny IP space. If that's all the socking evidence there is, it's not convincing in this case. Andy Dingley (talk) 00:19, 14 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]