User talk:Barron2773737

December 2023[edit]

Hello, I'm ContinueWithCaution. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Arm have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. C_(u)w_(t)C_(c) 02:27, 8 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

January 2024[edit]

Hello, I'm BusterD. I noticed that you recently removed content from Arm without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. BusterD (talk) 02:27, 1 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop. If you continue to add unsourced or poorly sourced content, as you did at Jason Momoa, you may be blocked from editing. BusterD (talk) 02:28, 1 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

January 2024[edit]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because your account is being used only for vandalism.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Chris 08:53, 1 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Barron2773737 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I am writing to appeal my current block, and I fully understand the importance of providing a clear and convincing case for unblocking. I acknowledge the reasons for my block, and I want to assure you that I have gained a better understanding of the policies and guidelines that govern Wikipedia.

I am committed to avoiding the behavior that led to the block, and I am eager to contribute positively to the Wikipedia community. I recognize the impact of my past actions and am dedicated to ensuring they do not recur. My intention is to be a constructive member of this community, and I am ready to adhere to the highest standards of conduct.

If there are specific concerns or areas that need clarification, please let me know, and I will address them promptly. I believe that by lifting the block, I can make valuable contributions to Wikipedia in a responsible and respectful manner.

I appreciate your time and consideration in reviewing my appeal. Thank you for your attention to this matter.Barron2773737 (talk) 09:19, 1 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

AI/chatbot generated requests are not considered. We want to hear from you, not an AI. 331dot (talk) 09:47, 1 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.