User talk:Basil Jradeh

Welcome!

Hello, Basil Jradeh, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as Hmdw architects, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may soon be deleted.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} on this page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! — Pewfly (talk) 14:44, 2 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Hmdw architects

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Hmdw architects requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person, organization (band, club, company, etc.) or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. — Pewfly (talk) 14:44, 2 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

HMDW Architects

Hello Mr. Basil Jradeh,

First of all thank you in taking time to contact me. I'll try to explain why the images were deleted. I assume that they were taken by you for your company, HMDW Architects, while serving as their photographer. This means that your company payed for you to take the photographs. So ultimately, the company has the copyright privileges. Unless your company has explicitly stated anywhere that the photographs are available under a suitable license, Wikipedia (or Commons) cannot accept it. The best way to get them into Wikipedia would be to explicitly state on the website of your company that they are available under a creative commons license (I suggest this one), and that you, Basil Jradeh is the photographer. Remember that the license should allow non-restricted usage of the photographs (including commercial). You should also link the license agreement to the photo when you upload it. This would solve all problems related to photographs. And if putting up a copyright notice on the website is difficult, you could email Wikimedia saying that they are available under a free license (see OTRS for more details). Wikipedia is always in need of good photographs and photographers.

Now coming to the article. The article is nearly fit enough to be included. First off, Wikipedia follows a strict policy (WP:CORP) when it comes to articles about corporations and businesses. Your company seems to focus on renovations of old and historic buildings. I see that your company has done renovations on the Phoenix Cinema and some other churches which are notable. So please include references (other than company websites) which support these. And take out sentences like "The Directors are AABC registered" which seems promotional. In short, cleanup the article removing all kinds of promotional material, and use reliable, secondary sources (news articles would be great). One thing that you should note is that these secondary sources should cover your company sufficiently. They shouldn't be just brief announcements (for example, this reference you used does not carry any weight). Wikipedia has a very clear policy regarding this as well (WP:CORPDEPTH).

Don't hesitate to contact me if you have any doubt. If you are not satisfied with my help alone, you could edit this page and place {{helpme}} anywhere, and somebody will turn up to help you out. Cheers! — Pewfly (talk) 17:55, 6 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Pewfly,

Many thanks for your reply, its really great to have such in-depth help, as a new user.

I have emailed wiki permissions using their copyright template, from my company's email account as suggested by another wiki moderator, hopefully I did this correctly, so the images will be cleared for use soon, and I will be able to put them back in the gallery.

I disagree with your comment that 'AABC registered' is inappropriate - this is a qualification, rather than an award or promotion of any kind, and I think it is important in identifying what work our firm is based in. Would you still want it deleted, or perhaps moved into external links?

I understand your complaint that the sources need to have more in-depth relevance, however the policy does say: 'If the depth of coverage is not substantial, then multiple independent sources should be cited to establish notability.' This morning I have tried to add a lot more backup information - I hope its looking like a more reasonable article now: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Basil_Jradeh

Although the article has some minor issues regarding formatting, I think it is fine enough to be included. Any other problems will be cleared by other editors. And as for the sentence I mentioned, I still maintain that it looks slightly promotional. You don't have to remove it though, but don't be disheartened if some reviewing editor removes it. And please don't stop your contributions to Wikipedia, we always need good editors! Cheers! — Pewfly (talk) 18:02, 7 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

		The Exceptional Newcomer Award
		For being very productive and making great contributions. Anna Frodesiak (talk) 14:12, 24 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your article has been moved to AfC space

Hi! I would like to inform you that the Articles for Creation submission which was previously located here: User:Basil Jradeh/St Jude's Church has been moved to Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/St Jude's Church, this move was made automatically and doesn't affect your article, if you have any questions please ask on my talk page! Have a nice day. ArticlesForCreationBot (talk) 15:18, 24 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation

Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit once you feel they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/St Jude's Church.
To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the help desk or via live help

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! Sionk (talk) 00:35, 26 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation

St Jude's Church, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you are more than welcome to continue submitting work to Articles for Creation.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

mabdul 17:01, 26 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

February 2012

Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, such as on User talk:mabdul, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You could also click on the signature button or located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when they said it. Thank you. mabdul 12:36, 27 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback

Hello, Basil Jradeh. You have new messages at Mabdul's talk page.
Message added 12:37, 27 February 2012 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]

mabdul 12:37, 27 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent edits

Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You could also click on the signature button or located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when they said it. Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 12:51, 27 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of HMDW Architects for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article HMDW Architects is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/HMDW Architects until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

WikiOriginal-9 (talk) 02:44, 13 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]