Jump to content

User talk:Beardocratic

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is not a legitimate use of an alternative account, per WP:SOCK. This account is now blocked. Guy (Help!) 15:55, 25 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Guy - I appreciate that it appears that I am associated with someone else, but I'm genuinely not?! How do I go about proving this? There is a special irony that I make my first post, and I get banned for it. :P (FULL DISCLOSURE - I had a previous account under my own real nameI had started editing with, and got personally attacked in real life over it, so I left Wikipedia years ago, now figured I'd start a new account. What do I do now?) Beardocratic (talk) 19:28, 25 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Beardocratic (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

I'm not a sock puppet. I'm a unique human being with no other account. There is an edit war between two users (Wiki-shield and Taeyebaar), where they are edit warring over brain-related articles - and user Taeyebaar has singled me out. Please feel free to send me an email - or I can leave my personal contact info here to prove I'm not one of them. I'm not related to the field.

Decline reason:

If you're not a sockpuppet, you're definitely a meatpuppet. In any case, Wikipedia is better off without you and your partners. OhNoitsJamie Talk 19:47, 26 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Blocked as a sockpuppet

[edit]
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Beardocratic (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

I am genuinely sorry for getting involved in an obvious editing war, and although I'm not connected in any way with the two suspect biased accounts in question - I do have the belief that the various articles surrounding these subjects are being heavily manipulated and prejuidiced by these individuals (and this fact is ignored by administrators because the editors are so emotionally connected). However, I humbly request that you re-instate my account, where I will only do good from here on in and leave said articles alone. I promise to do good from here on in, and apologize for coming off as a meatpuppet! Beardocratic (talk) 19:57, 26 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Using even the unblock request to accuse others of bias without evidence won't help you getting unblocked; see WP:NOTTHEM. If all you intend to do on Wikipedia is get other users booted off the project, I agree with OhNoItsJamie that we're better off without you. Huon (talk) 15:13, 31 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.