User talk:Mishash

Welcome!

Hello, Mishash, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{help me}} on this page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome!--Mishae (talk) 16:39, 6 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I see you are watching some of the same articles

Thanks, Mishash, for updating the references in some of the articles on my watchlist in the last twenty-four hours. It looks like we have some matching research interests and you are taking care with the references in articles. Do you follow Wiki Project Psychology? Most of the articles in the scope of that project, such as those you have recently been editing, are in need of a great deal of editing, so it's good to see you pitching in. See you on the wiki. -- WeijiBaikeBianji (talk, how I edit) 14:46, 11 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked for sockpuppetry

This account has been blocked from editing for a period of 1 week for sock puppetry per evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Mishash. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not, and that any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted. Once the block has expired, you're welcome to make useful contributions. If you believe that this block was in error, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Mike V • Talk 16:16, 26 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Mishash (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I don't have multiple accounts and never used my account inappropriately... I assume my account was blocked because I am on the same network as my friend Joe who is having some kind of argument on Wikipedia Mishash (talk) 17:06, 26 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

"It was my friend's fault" is never an acceptable excuse. As a checkuser has "likely" confirmed your accounts match, it is technically impossible to tell you are two separate people or not. I think you'll have to accept a free week off - sorry. Ritchie333 ^(talk) ^(cont) 18:48, 26 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Mike, I went to the link provided in your account blocking message and it mentions 2 accounts associated with mine: Wiki-shield and Beardocratic. It looks like Wiki-shield is my partner's account. Joe told me this morning that my account got deleted because of him but I tried it and it worked fine, I even had time to do a few contributions. Then I got your message that it is blocked. I have no clue who is Beardocratic... we don't have anybody else here.

May 2015

This account has been blocked indefinitely as a sock puppet that was created to violate Wikipedia policy. Note that using multiple accounts is allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not, and that all edits made while evading a block or ban may be reverted or deleted. If this account is not a sock puppet, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Bbb23 (talk) 18:05, 28 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Mishash (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Can somebody explain what's going on here??? First I am blocked from editing for one week and blamed for "sockpoppetry"(?), I already explained that I have nothing to do with it but was told to relax and take an editing break for one week... ok, fine. Today I get a new email message from Wikipedia that I'm now blocked indefinitely...? Can somebody please investigate what's happening? I have no sentimental attachment to this account and can create another one, but I assume something is wrong with Wikipedia technical tools. If it's still related to Joe's editing (yes, he is quite pissed off with Wikipedia), may be some authority admin can contact us and verify that we are two separate people? Mishash (talk) 18:55, 28 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Your account is Technically indistinguishable to Wiki-shield (talk · contribs), and in this context, you're blocked from editing. PhilKnight (talk) 19:34, 28 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

You were indefinitely blocked because you have continued creating and editing with socks. See User:StarbucksLatte. And threatening to create another sock isn't going to help you.--Bbb23 (talk) 19:11, 28 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Bbb23, I have not created any accounts/socks, something seriously wrong is going on here. Could you please ask some superusers to check these other accounts (their IPs, locations) and verify this? It is total mystery to me... I have done absolutely nothing to deserve such treatment. Mishash (talk) 21:11, 28 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Please note that it is you, personally, who is blocked, not just one specific account. Any further account that you create will also be blocked. --Anthony Bradbury^"talk" 19:30, 28 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Dear User:Anthony.bradbury, as per my message to Bbb23, I have not created any accounts/socks, something seriously wrong is going on here. Could you please ask some superusers to check these other accounts (their IPs, locations) and verify this? It is total mystery to me... I have done absolutely nothing to deserve such treatment. Mishash (talk) 21:11, 28 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

- This is my last message to Wikipedia. Once again I repeat that I have never did anything wrong and never created any puppets, socks, or whatever you call these. I was trying to help edit Wikipedia and then got blocked for no apparent reasons. It will be great if some admin takes an effort to investigate this in depth and clears my name, otherwise there is not much I can do. Goodbye and all the best! Mishash (talk) 22:34, 28 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Mishash, here is the investigation: Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Mishash/Archive. The accounts were checked. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 19:18, 29 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]