User talk:Beeromatic
Image tagging for Image:Francisrick.JPG
[edit]Thanks for uploading Image:Francisrick.JPG. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.
For more information on using images, see the following pages:
This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 15:01, 23 August 2006 (UTC)
Richard Lynn page
[edit]
Welcome to Wikipedia. We invite everyone to contribute constructively to our encyclopedia. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing. However, unconstructive edits, such as those you made to Richard Lynn, are considered vandalism. If you continue in this manner you may be blocked from editing without further warning. Please stop, and consider improving rather than damaging the hard work of others. Thanks. --Ramdrake 15:29, 4 September 2006 (UTC)
Remember the Titans
[edit]Article talk pages are for discussion of the article, not for posting opinions of the subject itself. Please try to confine your comments to article content. Thanks. Kafziel 14:20, 6 September 2006 (UTC)
- Well gee, thanks for the advice Kafziel, although considering that personal opinion is abound on WP's discussion pages, I find it rather sanctimonious of you to single me out. Beeromatic 15:15, 6 September 2006 (UTC)
- I didn't single you out. I saw what you wrote because I removed a bunch of crap from that article a few days ago and it was still on my watchlist. Personal opinion is fine if it's about the article, but talk pages aren't the place for personal commentary about the subject. I've said the same thing to others in the past, and none of them felt the need for a sarcastic reply. Kafziel 15:51, 6 September 2006 (UTC)
- Harumph, well I'm not one to apologise typically, but I guess I've been in a crappy mood today - so sorry for the above remark, and yes, you are right about my comment in that it has no relevance to the article. Pointless and flippant it may be, but I stand by it completely - the film really does stink. Beeromatic 16:43, 6 September 2006 (UTC)
- I didn't single you out. I saw what you wrote because I removed a bunch of crap from that article a few days ago and it was still on my watchlist. Personal opinion is fine if it's about the article, but talk pages aren't the place for personal commentary about the subject. I've said the same thing to others in the past, and none of them felt the need for a sarcastic reply. Kafziel 15:51, 6 September 2006 (UTC)
Orphaned fair use image (Image:Richard Lynn smaller.jpg)
[edit]Thanks for uploading Image:Richard Lynn smaller.jpg. I notice the 'image' page currently specifies that the image is unlicensed for use on Wikipedia and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable under fair use (see our fair use policy).
If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Chowbok ☠ 17:57, 5 November 2006 (UTC)
){kind=link}