User talk:Beezhive

SEMI-RETIRED

This user is no longer very active on Wikipedia.

NOTE: If you leave a message for me here, I will reply here (unless otherwise requested). -- BeezHive

Welcome

Hello, Beezhive, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions; I hope you like the place and decide to stay. We're glad to have you in our community! I see you've already been very active in fighting vandals: I hope you'll continue to help and register with Wikipedia while you're at it.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Though we all make mistakes, here is what Wikipedia is not. If you have any questions or concerns, don't hesitate to see the help pages or add a question to the village pump. The Community Portal can also be very useful. Also, you can drop me a line if you need to.

Happy editing! --David Fuchs (talk • contribs) 00:13, 19 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

PORCUPINE TREE http://www.roadrunnerrecords.com/news/PORCUPINE-TREE-SIGNS-WITH-ROADRUNNER-RECORDS-20245.aspx

So, youre telling me an official record label website is making up a false story about a band being signed to their record label internationally? Youre absolutely mad! —Preceding unsigned comment added by 64.141.83.253 (talk) 00:51, 4 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Well, that ~~contradicts~~ contradicted the band's page. Since you didn't reference the above link when you made the page, I naturally reverted the change. Thanks. -- BeezHive (talk|contribs) 04:01, 4 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

CSD on Southern Air Charter

Just an FYI, but the CSD tag you put on Southern Air Charter was incorrect. It really should have been {{db-empty}} instead of a nonsense page. Thanks for helping out tagging articles. =) -- Gogo Dodo 05:44, 6 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

You are, of course, correct. I was going with "provides no meaningful content or history" from db-nonsense, but it didn't seem right to me. Thanks for correcting me. --Beezhive 11:36, 6 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Julox article

I would like any help you can offer as to how I can get that article to be a respectable article on this site. I feel that he is just as notable as many of the other musicians on here. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Slick80 (talk • contribs) 17:23, 15 March 2007 (UTC). After reading what is considered as notable I still do not see why you decided to delete my article. Pherhaps I will retry. Once Again, I would like any insight you have on this.Slick80 17:43, 15 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

To be clear, I did not delete the article - I just nominated it. Without the text of the article to refer back to (I'm not sure of the details; I make a habit of going through new articles and nominating for deletion as seems appropriate), I'd guess I nominated it because I did not see any references to major tours, awards, etc that would qualify the musician as notable, per WP:BAND. There were certainly no citations of reliable sources (or any sources that I can recall) in the article. --Beezhive 20:21, 15 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Well I got to tell ya that I'm really new and I'm trying to figure things out. I didn't even realize that when you hit save that it made it so everyone else could see it. I thought I was saving my progress. I spent a good deal of time working on that. To be honest with you I was planning on trying to add some references but that sure didn't work out. I honestly don't know that I have the patience for this, I tried to redo the article and someone deleted it even faster the second time. I wish everyone would give me half a chance before they just go removing things. As far as asking them to review it, I'm lost just like I'm not really any good at adding in the references. Oh well. I've already wasted way to much time on this and don't have anything to show for it.Slick80 21:46, 15 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

If you need some temporary space to work on an article, you can create a user subpage, such as User:Slick80/Julox and then link to it from your user homepage so you don't forget it. Pages such as that are much less likely to be deleted (although I'd still be careful of copyright violations) and provide a good space to work an article. When you feel the article's in good shape, you can copy it to a real article and request that the temporary page be deleted. If you use such a page, I'd just put a note at the top indicating what you're doing. I hope that's of some help. Try not to get too discouraged - article creation can be a real pain. I tend to do mostly tweaking of existing pages, which is probably a far easier way to get into editing Wikipedia. --Beezhive 21:53, 15 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Daniel Miller-Medzon

Hi. This page is back. Still db-bio, still not notable, sourced from this admitted autobiography page. — Jeff G. (talk|contribs) 22:23, 22 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

deleted page

It's short because it was deleted for spam??!. All I wanted to do was create about me page on MYTALK,which is MY own page. Somehow it didn't work. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Dmitri1999 (talk • contribs) 03:25, 29 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

It was nominated for deletion because it was in the main article space (not your talk page), and lacked assertion of notability. For some reason, your talk page was redirected there. I removed the redirect. -- BeezHive (talk|contribs) 03:31, 29 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

-ist

In an earlier era, the terms “homosexualism”, “homosexualist”, and “transvestist” had currency. The last was used in more than one of the titles of Cauldwell's LBBs. —SlamDiego_←T 06:27, 13 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Ah, fair enough - I'd assumed it was a typo. Thanks for correcting me. -- BeezHive (talk|contribs) 06:35, 13 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Tanks for your contributions

I've added you to the Porcupine Tree WikiProject- I hope you don't mind. Synesthetize (talk) 14:32, 23 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Not at all. -- BeezHive (talk|contribs) 01:07, 24 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Re:Pneumoultramicroscopicsilvivolcanocaniossis

It's not nonsense, it's simply a misspelling (a horrific one, at that) of an actual article, Pneumanoultramicroscopicsilicovolcanoconiosis which is a real disease, in addition to being one of the longest words in the English language. Miquonranger03 (talk) 03:56, 4 September 2008 (UTC) :D[reply]

BTW, please reply on my talk page. It's much easier that way. :D Miquonranger03 (talk) 03:57, 4 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Now that is something everyone can agree on. :) I think we can just either delete it or redirect it to the actual article, correctly spelled.

I'm heavily leaning towards deletion, since with one-word-long article names of this length, users either know the correct spelling or they have never heard of it. There are no common misspellings with this word, so I'd certainly delete it. Miquonranger03 (talk) 04:10, 4 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Timothy's House

Hi. You nominated Timothy's House for deletion (good call by the way). I was about to comment on it and I noticed that the article links to a user page that appears to be an article (I'm guessing it's not since it's under User:). Both Timothy's House & the user page were created by User:Timothyhouse1. Before I jump the gun, just wanted to bring this to your attention and ask if you think there might be a possible COI and/or promotion. Thanks. Pinkadelica (talk) 06:20, 5 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

It certainly looks like a COI to me. The user definitely appears to be somehow related to the topic (in fact, I'd guess that they live in the area). -- BeezHive (talk|contribs) 06:24, 5 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the quick reply. I'll follow up and report him. Pinkadelica (talk) 06:28, 5 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Patrick R. Allen

Yes, thank you for pointing that out, I've fixed it. I'm on a recent changes roll at the moment and it must've passed my eye. Thank you for the heads up. DiverseMentality^{(Discuss it)} 07:56, 5 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Chris Underhill

An article that you have been involved in editing, Chris Underhill, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chris Underhill. Thank you. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? WWGB (talk) 12:45, 9 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, I've never learned to close AFDs; the only time that I tried, it closed every single nomination in that day's archives, and someone else had to fix it. Nyttend (talk) 14:49, 9 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

New Page Patrolling

Hello. I noticed today that you were doing newpages patrolling but are not marking some of the pages you visit as patrolled. Though this is not mandatory in any way, and should not be done for all newpages, where appropriate it keeps your fellow patrollers from wasting time reviewing the same page multiple times. In any event, keep up the good work! Thanks. NuclearWarfare ^{contact me}_{My work} 04:11, 10 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Actually, I've been trying to do that, but I have a habit of doing it last, after I check user contributions (for vandals), etc. I'll try to ensure I mark the pages promptly in the future. -- BeezHive (talk|contribs) 04:14, 10 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Brewno

I noticed that there is a page Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Submissions/Brewno, created by the same person (Gumbyfly00) that created the Brewno article (which you closed out the AFD for). I believe that this page should be deleted, but am unsure of the process to use - CSD G8 or G6 (housekeeping/AFD) seem likely candidates. Would you please check it out when you have a chance? Thanks. -- BeezHive (talk|contribs) 12:19, 16 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

It should be marked as declined, see WP:AFC and this list of templates. Stifle (talk) 12:28, 16 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for pointing me in the right direction, I was just a bit confused by it being in the Wikipedia talk space. -- BeezHive (talk|contribs) 12:56, 16 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Competition Cams Article

Comment - The Competition Cams article has been completely rewritten and re-cited with new, more credible sources. I urge each of the editors that has previously voted against the articles notability, neutrality, etc. to please reconsider.

--Jabarke1 (talk) 18:29, 26 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I struck my delete !vote yesterday, but haven't yet had a chance to review the article. -- BeezHive (talk|contribs) 18:41, 26 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Malaka Dewapriya

I have edited article name Malaka Dewapriya —Preceding unsigned comment added by Sarathwikum (talk • contribs) 12:39, 29 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

clarkandblakemovies deletion

Why are you deleting this? It is not to advertise it is to inform people of a channel I found on YouTube. Please respond. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 29058000071733lc (talk • contribs) 22:39, 10 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I didn't delete it (I'm not an admin), but I did nominate it for deletion. I did this because it does not appear to meet Wikipedia's notability guidelines for web content, as indicated in the notice on your talk page. -- BeezHive (talk|contribs) 22:45, 10 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

wittygraphy deletion

in response to your deletion of the page and your request to refrain from introducing such page, I dont see why this is more irrelevant than many other social networks listed on Wikipedia. Many of them have far less traffic than that so what is your definition of notability? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Wittygraphy (talk • contribs) 15:15, 25 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

First off, I didn't delete the article (I can't), but rather proposed it for deletion. I did this because it didn't appear to meet Wikipedia's notability guidelines, specifically the notability criterion for web content. The article (as I recall) didn't cite any reliable 3rd party sources. Additionally, the existence of articles on other social networking sites does not necessarily imply that the article should exist (though it may). Finally, judging by your username, you may have a conflict of interest - that is to say that you're somehow involved in or associated with wittygraphy. In general, it's best not to create or edit articles that you are somehow related to because it's difficult to keep a neutral point of view. If you have any questions/concerns, let me know. -- BeezHive (talk|contribs) 15:46, 25 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of "University Scholars of Seattle Pacific University" for deletion

A discussion has begun about whether the article University Scholars of Seattle Pacific University, to which you contributed, should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/University Scholars of Seattle Pacific University until a consensus is reached, and you are welcome to contribute to the discussion.

You may edit the article during the discussion, including to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. --Bejnar (talk) 20:08, 18 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:33, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Beezhive. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Beezhive. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]