User talk:Behavingnose

MILGEM project[edit]

As the page refers to more than just the corvettes, the title of the article should reflect that. Secondly, your new page title was incorrectly formatted. Please read WP:NC-SHIP on how to format article titles for ship classes. Llammakey (talk) 09:49, 13 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

References[edit]

Hi Behavingsnose, thanks for creating the new article about Quantum Capital Partners. Unfortunately the article is entirely unsourced, so it may not be retained. Please review the article and source it with independent, reliable references. In the meantime I have removed potentially controversial statements about their revenue and staff levels. Similarly, your addition to the Revell article was unsourced. I have added a reference to support this statement. If you have any questions, please le me know. _pseudonym Jake Brockman ^talk 16:01, 21 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Quantum Capital Partners[edit]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Quantum Capital Partners requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a company, corporation or organization that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. reddogsix (talk) 16:56, 21 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

December 2018[edit]

Hello, I'm Danski454. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Advertising Standards Authority (United Kingdom) have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help Desk. Thanks. Danski454 (talk) 17:05, 10 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Question for administrator[edit]

This request for help from administrators has been answered. If you need more help or have additional questions, please reapply the {{admin help}} template, or contact the responding user(s) directly on their own user talk page.

--Behavingnose (talk) 18:26, 28 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Firstly, this isn't an administrative issue, and an administrator is in no more of a position to help with it than any other editor.

I copied a piece of the quoted verse, and pasted it into a search site. It came up with a large number of hits, indicating that the verse is indeed well known and often quoted as "The Firefighters' Prayer". If you make a similar search, you should be able to find plenty of "sources" in Wikipedia's sense, one or more of which you can cite in the article. The description "source unknown" in the article appears to mean that it isn't known who wrote the poem, or when or where, rather than that there is no known "source" in Wikipedia's sense. (The quote from the poem which I searched for is "When I am called to duty, God, Wherever flames may rage, Give me strength to save a life, Whatever be its age.") JBW (talk) 20:43, 28 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Behavingnose (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Caught by an open proxy block but this host or IP is not an open proxy. My IP address is 5.151.93.195. Place any further information here. I currently live in a flat located within university accommodation in the UK. I assume the IP has been blocked due to others causing issues by this IP however, I would never do so and I only wish to improve Wikipedia articles. I hope the IP can be unbanned or another solution can be reached so that I can continue contributing helpful information including literature, pictures, videos, audio files etc.

Decline reason:

Procedural decline as your account is not directly blocked. Yes, the IP is. Best suggestion I have is that you go to WP:IPECPROXY and follow the instructions there to request IP block exemption so that these blocks won't affect you. — Daniel Case (talk) 06:46, 28 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.