User talk:Bemben17

February 2019

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Krzysztof Kononowicz. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Wham2001 (talk) 20:45, 24 February 2019 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Krzysztof Kononowicz. Wham2001 (talk) 20:57, 24 February 2019 (UTC)

MfD nomination of Draft:Stanly Mazur

Draft:Stanly Mazur, a page which you created or substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; you may participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Draft:Stanly Mazur and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of Draft:Stanly Mazur during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Wham2001 (talk) 21:12, 24 February 2019 (UTC)

February 2019

Please do not create, maintain or restore hoaxes on Wikipedia, as you did at Draft:Stanly Mazur. If you are interested in how accurate Wikipedia is, a more constructive test method would be to try to find inaccurate statements that are already in Wikipedia—and then to correct them if possible. Please do not disrupt Wikipedia. Continued disruption will be met with being blocked from editing, or other sanctions. Feel free to take a look at the five pillars of Wikipedia to learn more about this project and how you can contribute constructively. Thank you. CoolSkittle (talk) 21:19, 24 February 2019 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:Stanly Mazur

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, introducing inappropriate pages, such as Draft:Stanly Mazur, is not in accordance with our policies. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Under section G3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, the page has been nominated for deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Legacypac (talk) 21:37, 24 February 2019 (UTC)

February 2019

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but you removed a speedy deletion tag from a page you have created yourself. If you believe the page should not be deleted, you may contest the deletion by clicking on the button that says: Contest this speedy deletion which appears inside the speedy deletion notice. This will allow you to make your case on the talk page. Administrators will consider your reasoning before deciding what to do with the page. Thank you. Wham2001 (talk) 21:47, 24 February 2019 (UTC)

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abuse of editing privileges.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  PhilKnight (talk) 22:15, 24 February 2019 (UTC)