User talk:Ben10027

Vandalism

Don't vandalize the AK-47 page. Koalorka (talk) 18:54, 30 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

As they say in the movies, "oh be-have". Seriously, though, we are trying to write an encyclopedia here, so don't make joke edits, as you did to AK-47. Some readers looking for a serious article might not find them amusing. Remember, millions of people read Wikipedia, so we have to take what we do a bit seriously here. If you'd like to experiment with editing, try the sandbox, where you can write whatever you want (as long as it's not offensive). Maybe you should check out Wikipedia:Bad Jokes and Other Deleted Nonsense. '''I am Asamuel''' (talk) 18:32, 30 March 2008 (UTC) --'''I am Asamuel''' (talk) 18:32, 30 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

March 2008

Hi, the recent edit you made to AK-47 has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thanks. J.delanoy ^gabs _adds 18:56, 30 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

April 2008

Please do not gratuitously remove content from Wikipedia, as you did to the Rotavirus page. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. SandyGeorgia (Talk) 17:03, 7 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not gratuitously remove content from Wikipedia, as you did to the User:SandyGeorgia page. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. SandyGeorgia (Talk) 17:05, 7 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits.
The next time you delete or blank page content or templates from Wikipedia, as you did to User:J.delanoy, you will be blocked from editing. J.delanoy ^gabs _adds 22:40, 7 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 24 hours in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for vandalism. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make constructive contributions. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}} below.

Gwernol 22:46, 7 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I am not a SOCKPUPPET!!!!

I HAVE BEEN BANNED AND I HAVE NOT BROKEN WIKI POLICY!!!

In that case, can you explain to me why you removed exactly the same reference from Queens Park Rangers F.C. as User:Benyank (a sockpuppet of User:JackQPR who was then blocked) did this morning? Or exactly the same types as edits as another sockpuppet, User:Ben10023? Too much of a coincidence for me, certainly. Anyway, if you want to request unblock, you'll need to place {{unblock|reason}} on this page, replacing "reason" with your reason for being unblocked. Black Kite 15:03, 16 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

THIS guy has told me to edit what i guss he did. And i KNOW its him because be made a account called "benyank" (Ben is MY name be the way!!! and i am American!!!) and ben10023 was my old account and he did the same thing, told me to do something for him and.... turns out that it was some weird sockpuppet" thing!!! please i am just trying to have 1 account! Jack Temple is jackQPR he is my friend and he wants to make my life awful!!! also "bengio" is him because my last name he copied. please!!!!

So let me get this right - a banned editor asked you to edit something for you, and you did, and you got blocked for it as a sock/meatpuppet - so you created a new account, and when he asked you again, you did it again?? What did you think would happen? Black Kite 15:11, 16 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I am prepared to unblock you on one condition - you don't touch ANYTHING related to English football and hooliganism. Is that fair? Black Kite 15:14, 16 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Yes I wont!!! I swear!! If I do you can block me forever!!!!!

OK, you are unblocked - don't do it again! Black Kite 15:19, 16 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]