User talk:Beuschman

Image Tagging Image:Grassy Knoll.JPG[edit]

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Grassy Knoll.JPG. I notice the 'image' page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is therefore unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikipedia (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page.

If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use {{GFDL}} to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media qualifies as fair use, please read fair use, and then use a tag such as {{Non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair_use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Longhair 23:57, 1 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:Plaque - Former Texas School Book Depository.JPG[edit]

Image Copyright problem

Thank you for uploading Image:Plaque - Former Texas School Book Depository.JPG. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 21:00, 27 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:TSBD Front Entrance.JPG[edit]

Image Copyright problem

Thank you for uploading Image:TSBD Front Entrance.JPG. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 21:06, 27 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:Zapruder Pedestal.JPG[edit]

Image Copyright problem

Thank you for uploading Image:Zapruder Pedestal.JPG. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 21:13, 27 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

November 2014[edit]

Hello, I'm Barek. I noticed that you recently removed some content from 2014 World Series without explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; I restored the removed content. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks! --- Barek (talk • contribs) - 19:08, 26 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for providing a revert reason this time - but it doesn't resolve the fact that the material is well sourced to multiple third-party reliable sources. Your not liking it, or the fact that other articles do not yet have such a section is not relevant - what matters is what is said in sources and agreed for inclusion by community consensus.

Please take your dispute of the material to the article talk page, and get consensus there for removal before blanking again. --- Barek (talk • contribs) - 19:15, 26 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I suggest you self revert now. Your threat in your edit summary to disrupt Wikipedia by edit warring is blockable. Get consensus before blanking. --- Barek (talk • contribs) - 19:17, 26 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent editing history at 2014 World Series shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you get reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. – Muboshgu (talk) 19:21, 26 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked temporarily from editing for edit warring. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.

During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. - Barek (talk • contribs) - 19:26, 26 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]