User talk:Bib123456

Nomination of Peter Byck for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Peter Byck, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.

The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Peter Byck until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:02, 3 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Peter Byck COI

Hi Bib123456. Can I ask if you have any connection to Peter Byck? While you asking for the article to be moved to draftspace makes sense, I am just wondering that given your extensive work on the page, the only page you have ever edited on Wikipedia, if you either are Peter Byck or have some connection with him? In particular, how would you have come across a photo of him if you are not connected? Conflict of Interest editing is strongly discouraged, and any conflict of interest should be declared on either your talk page, or the talk page of the article Dexxtrall (talk) 15:02, 1 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Dexxtrall. Thank you so much for your response. I probably got in over my head, as I never edited on Wikipedia before and wasn't aware of all the rules. I started out just wanting to fix a couple of things on his existing page and add some links (unsure who created the page originally, but it has been up for a long time,) and then thought I'll add more info. I do work with him. I will make sure it is factual and impartial and add mention of a connection to the talk page before submitting the draft for review. Thanks again! --Bib123456 (talk) 14:07, 2 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Peter Byck (March 7)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Salimfadhley was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

This subject does not seem to have received significant coverage in reliable secondary sources. The article's lead section should clearly show what makes this subject notable and link to sources that provide significant coverage. Notability is not transient, so the director of a notable film is not automatically notable.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Peter Byck and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Peter Byck, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Salimfadhley (talk) 00:47, 7 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Bib123456! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Salimfadhley (talk) 00:47, 7 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]