User talk:Big Bad Baby

Welcome!

Hello, Big Bad Baby, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! Mushroom (Talk) 03:31, 21 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Nintendo

Nintendo is awesome!!!! - BBradyFish

linking individual years

Please don't wiki-link individual years in articles - e.g., don't turn 1967 into 1967, or 1930s into 1930s . Those links don't add any information, and just create more blue words to distract readers. - DavidWBrooks 11:23, 23 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hello

Hello there. Just thought I would touch base with you. Please leave me a note on my talk page. Qutezuce 21:05, 25 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Duplicate links

Hi,

I reverted your addition of links to Cereal Partners Worldwide; we normally only link the first occurrence of a word.

There may be exceptions to this; personally, I feel that in a long article where someone shouldn't have been assumed to have read every preceding section, it's quite reasonable to re-link the first occurrence in a distinct section.

However, in short articles, or within sections (as in this case), we only need one link. Thanks!

Fourohfour 12:23, 26 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:Tomcarvel.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Tomcarvel.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Image legality questions. 15:24, 27 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Tomcarvel.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:Tomcarvel.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use. Suggestions on how to do so can be found here.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Rette tast 19:18, 16 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Marysee.gif

I have tagged Image:Marysee.gif as {{no rationale}}, because it does not provide a fair use rationale. If you believe the image to be acceptable for fair use according to Wikipedia policy, please provide a rationale explaining as much, in accordance with the fair use rationale guideline, on the image description page. Please also consider using {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair_use. Thank you. Rette tast 19:18, 16 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Tintin's Travel Diaries

The article Tintin's Travel Diaries has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No evidence of notability (in article or online). Tintin is extremely notable, but not all of the many, many derived media is notable as well.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Fram (talk) 07:53, 13 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Squidward Johanssen Tentacles listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Squidward Johanssen Tentacles. Since you had some involvement with the Squidward Johanssen Tentacles redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Steel1943 (talk) 22:48, 17 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Eugene Herbert Victor Krabs listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Eugene Herbert Victor Krabs. Since you had some involvement with the Eugene Herbert Victor Krabs redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Steel1943 (talk) 23:08, 17 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

"Columbia-TriStar Television" listed at Redirects for discussion

A discussion is taking place to address a potential problem with the redirect Columbia-TriStar Television and it has been listed for discussion. Anyone, including you, is welcome to participate at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 February 12 § Columbia-TriStar Television until a consensus is reached. From Bassie f (his talk page) 08:00, 12 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]