User talk:Biographyexpatie 11

Blocked as a sockpuppet

Wikipedia's technical logs indicate that this user account has been or may be used abusively as a sockpuppet of User:EXPLICITKID per the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/EXPLICITKID. It has been blocked indefinitely from editing to prevent abuse.

Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should review the guide to appealing blocks, and then appeal your block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}}. Note that anything you post in your unblock request will be public, so you may alternatively use the Unblock Ticket Request System to submit an appeal if it contains information that must be private.

Administrators: Checkusers have access to confidential system logs not accessible by the public or by administrators due to the Wikimedia Foundation's privacy policy. You must not loosen or remove this block, or issue an IP block exemption, without consulting with a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee. Administrators who undo checkuser blocks without permission from a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee may be summarily desysopped.

Girth Summit _(blether) 20:23, 7 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Biographyexpatie 11 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I see no reason why I should be blocked, I have been following Wikipedia rules, I have made corrections on articles like Quando Rondo, Broda Shaggi and Others. I will most grateful if my account is unblocked soon, and my account isn't a sockpuppet, Check the editsO made corrections to, Thank you for your support and help

Decline reason:

If we just unblocked people because they said they weren't sockpuppets, we might as well not even bother with a rule against, would we? — Daniel Case (talk) 07:48, 8 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Biographyexpatie 11 (talk) 06:03, 8 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Biographyexpatie 11 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I see no reason why my account should be blocked, I am trying to correct mistakes on edits made to Quando Rondo, Broda Shaggi And Others, I will be most grateful if my account is unblocked immediately, Thank you for your help If I and a sockpuppet, then why making edits, Yes I used multiple accounts, and It got blocked because I violated so many wiki rules, and I will never do that again, I have gone through Wikipedia lectures and policies now, The user {(user=EXPLICITKID)} was me, I made mistakes then, but that doesn't guarantee you should block this one because I haven't violated any rules on this one, I demand This Account be unblocked soon, Thank You

Decline reason:

You will need to return to your original account to request unblock, and it's doubtful that you will be unblocked before the period specificed by the standard offer. 331dot (talk) 17:05, 9 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Biographyexpatie 11 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

331dot, I don't know what you mean by me returning to my original account pls can you throw more light on that, pls I want this account unblocked because I haven't violated any rules here, even though I violated in other accounts I haven't here, By blocking my account, I think it's a Cyber bully did I violated here ? Pls unblock pls, I only made corrections to Quando Rondo (talk) 18:30, 9 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Please request unblock at your original account's talk page. Access to this talk page has been removed. --jpgordon^{𝄢𝄆𝄐𝄇} 17:42, 9 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

By your own words, "the user EXPLICITKID was me", so you must return to EXPLICITKID to request unblock, we don't unblock socks. 331dot (talk) 17:35, 9 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]