User talk:Biologoemerson666

March 2023

Hello, I'm Felida97. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Phoneutria, but you didn't provide a source. I’ve removed it for now, but if you’d like to include a citation to a reliable source and re-add it, please do so! If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Felida⁹⁷ (talk) 20:06, 15 March 2023 (UTC)

@Felida97 ok, can you let me add this new font please? Biologoemerson666 (talk) 20:11, 15 March 2023 (UTC)

You cannot add material to Wikipedia that has no reliable source to back it up. The Guinness World Book no longer lists this spider in it, so there are no sources to back up this claim. If you continue to try to add it, your posting privileges may be suspended. Dyanega (talk) 20:18, 15 March 2023 (UTC)

Please do not add or significantly change content without citing verifiable and reliable sources, as you did with this edit to Phoneutria. Before making any potentially controversial edits, it is recommended that you discuss them first on the article's talk page. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Yoshi24517 (Chat) (Online) 20:20, 15 March 2023 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Phoneutria, you may be blocked from editing.
Your edits have been automatically marked as vandalism and have been automatically reverted. The following is the log entry regarding this vandalism: Phoneutria was changed by Biologoemerson666 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.95446 on 2023-03-15T20:44:48+00:00

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 20:45, 15 March 2023 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Phoneutria. Felida⁹⁷ (talk) 20:47, 15 March 2023 (UTC)

Your recent editing history at Phoneutria shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war; read about how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Felida⁹⁷ (talk) 20:47, 15 March 2023 (UTC)

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because it appears that you are not here to build an encyclopedia.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  ... discospinster _talk 20:49, 15 March 2023 (UTC)