User talk:BlackRob1616

Aaron MCD, quit editing my page, you have no right to edit it anymore.

Talk pages are for good faith communication between editors. As long as the communication is good faith (i.e., not blatant vandalism, harassment, or three-revert-rule violations), he has the "right" to edit it. —C.Fred (talk) 02:56, 20 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

It is not good faith it is silly immature, blatant vandalism.

Are you sure? "Any good-faith effort to improve the encyclopedia, even if misguided or ill-considered, is not vandalism. Even harmful edits that are not explicitly made in bad faith are not vandalism." (From Wikipedia:Vandalism) —C.Fred (talk) 02:59, 20 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I am positive, that was definite vandalism, he was deliberately trying to paste false warnings on my talk page when I did nothing to him, except for post a warning on his talk page but he deserved it. There was no "good faith" anywhere in his comments, just silly blatant immature vandalism. And FYI, seeing as you're an admin you might want to block him before he vandalizes anymore pages. Also check his contributions. --BlackRob1616 (talk) 03:03, 20 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Regardless, you're only encouraging him by responding in kind. Next time, remove the nonsense and generally ignore him. -- Ricky81682 (talk) 10:25, 20 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Not harrasing

Acually, I am pretty sure that calling someone a retard is a harassment. --Abce2|AccessDenied 01:56, 20 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Stay out of my business and I will stay out of yours. Seriously, leave me alone. --BlackRob1616 (talk) 01:56, 20 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

And by the way further edits by you Abce2 will be reverted. Ok. Thank you.

May 2009

Please stop assuming ownership of articles such as Wikipedia:Sandbox. Doing so may lead to disruptive behavior such as edit wars and is a violation of policy, which may lead to a block from editing. Wuhwuzdat (talk) 02:21, 20 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I am not owing anything, you are allowed to test however you want in the sandbox without restrictions, go catch "OWNERS" elsewhere instead of harassing me. --BlackRob1616 (talk) 02:22, 20 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome!

Welcome to Wikipedia, BlackRob1616! I am Abce2 and have been editing Wikipedia for quite some time. I just wanted to say hi and welcome you to Wikipedia! If you have any questions, feel free to leave me a message on my talk page or by typing {{helpme}} at the bottom of this page. I love to help new users, so don't be afraid to leave a message! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Oh yeah, I almost forgot, when you post on talk pages you should sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); that should automatically produce your username and the date after your post. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Again, welcome!

Abce2|AccessDenied 02:25, 20 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

This is your last warning. You will be blocked from editing the next time you vandalize a page, as you did with this edit to Wikipedia:Administrator intervention against vandalism. Tiderolls 02:32, 20 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

You have been temporarily blocked from editing in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make constructive contributions. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here}} below, but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first. Cirt (talk) 02:36, 20 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

BlackRob1616 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I have a few reasons for beign unblocked. I realize that maybe I have had a few bad edits but I have learned from those. I promise if you unblock me, I will edit constructively and if I vandalize again you can reblock me, but I won't. Please, I have changed saw the mistakes of the past and will be assertive in the future.

Decline reason:

This edit summary, right after your unblock request, suggests that more consideration of the civility guidelines is in order before you are unblocked. —C.Fred (talk) 02:48, 20 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

BlackRob1616 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I understand why I have been blocked and that I must do better to be unblocked. I promise not to edit poorly again and I will consider editing constructively, oh and per what C. Fred said above about my edit summary does not violate WP:CIVIL, he was vandalizing my talk page and I just told him to grow up and leave it alone. So I promise not to be incivil in other cases and to consider positive contributions and not to vandalize ever again.

Decline reason:

So far, you have made zero edits which make the encyclopedia better. It is good that you are willing to consider editing constructively, but if you don't have any plans to make the encyclopedia better between now and the expiration of this block, then there is no reason to unblock the account. FisherQueen (talk · contribs) 12:13, 20 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

I had every right to say that, and I have learned from my mistakes, but he has no right to vandalize my page like that.