Jump to content

User talk:BlakeInDisguise

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Welcome[edit]

Welcome!

Hello, BlakeInDisguise, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to leave me a message or place "{{helpme}}" on this page and someone will drop by to help. DocTree (ʞlɐʇ·cont) Join WER 03:27, 7 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Some advice about your article[edit]

The article is now at User:BlakeInDisguise/Cab 20.

  • You don't have any references. They are needed for two reasons: (a) the WP:Verifiability policy: "any material challenged or likely to be challenged must be attributed to a reliable, published source", and (b) because Wikipedia is not a "list of everything", and is quite choosy about article subjects. The inclusion criterion used is called Wikipedia:Notability and is not a matter of opinion but has to be demonstrated by references showing "significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject." For bands, there is more detail at WP:BAND
  • Avoid exaggerated language like "tremendous publicity", and promotional phrases like "raw energy" and "still sounding polished" unless you are quoting someone independent like a review that says so. Wikipedia is very resistant to anything that seems like promotion. Don't try to "sell" the band. That was one reason why the page was deleted.
  • An encyclopedia article shouldn't be the band telling the world about itself, more someone outside describing it. All the lists of claimed influences, frankly, sound like name-dropping. I could easily say I was an artist influenced by Van Gogh, Picasso, Vermeer, Rembrandt... but that wouldn't actually tell you whether I was any good. What is needed is actual facts about what they have achieved. What label were their albums released on? Were they reviewed? Did they win any awards?

When it is ready, click the green "submit" button which will send it for review by an experienced user, who will either accept it or give you feedback. You said that they "are not globally known or massivly critically acclaimed", and I suspect you may find that they have not (yet) achieved what Wikipedia regards as notability enough to have an article; if so, don't be discouraged, it's a good learning experience to help you do better next time.

Regards, JohnCD (talk) 21:19, 26 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]