User talk:Blakepetty147

September 2016

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Morgan Rielly has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

• ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
• For help, take a look at the introduction.
• The following is the log entry regarding this message: Morgan Rielly was changed by Blakepetty147 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.957998 on 2016-09-28T23:37:50+00:00 .

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 23:37, 28 September 2016 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Morgan Rielly. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. ~Oshwah~^{(talk) (contribs)} 23:41, 28 September 2016 (UTC)

May 2017

Please stop adding unsourced content, as you did to Phil Kessel. This contravenes Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. d.g. L3X1 (distænt write) )evidence( 17:08, 26 May 2017 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Brendon Griffin (rugby)

The article Brendon Griffin (rugby) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails NATHLETE, GNG. Also an unsourced BLP, so technically that PROD route may be more appropriate.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. South Nashua (talk) 17:36, 26 May 2017 (UTC)

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abuse of editing privileges. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may request an unblock by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

Materialscientist (talk) 00:52, 27 May 2017 (UTC)