User talk:Bradandrews4

I do not understand why I have been blocked. I have not vandalised any of Wikipedia and I probably got hacked. I would request you unblock me

I shall hellp you

hi it's Dfrr i will help unblock you.Dfrr (talk) 00:33, 22 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Unblock Appeal - Very Sorry for any past wrong-doing!

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who accepted the request.

Bradandrews4 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

It has been 12 Years since the ban now; I would have been about 11 at the time; I am now coming on 24;

I honestly have no recollection of making the edit(s) which caused my ban, due to how long ago it was.
Admittedly, however, I can certainly see why it would have led to a ban, and all I can do is assure you, that it will not happen again!

Please accept my profuse apologies for any damages that I may have caused to Wikipedia, and I hope that you'll give me the opportunity to start-over and prove myself!

Thank you for taking the time to review my unblock request.

Bradandrews4 (talk) 12:49, 9 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Accept reason:

Happy to assume good faith here and lift the block. Please be careful; a resumption of vandalism will obviously lead to an immediate reblock. But as you say, it's been a very long time since you were blocked and I don't expect to see any problems. Happy editing! Yamla (talk) 13:07, 9 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome!

Hi Bradandrews4! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date.

Happy editing! --Yamla (talk) 13:07, 9 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Conflict of interest

Hello, Bradandrews4. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:

avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, colleagues, company, organization or competitors;
propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (you can use the {{request edit}} template);
disclose your conflict of interest when discussing affected articles (see Wikipedia:Conflict of interest#How to disclose a COI);
avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see WP:Spam);
do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure.

Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. --Yamla (talk) 14:40, 9 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: RankMyHack (October 13)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by JavaHurricane was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject. Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:RankMyHack and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:RankMyHack, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Java Hurricane 06:16, 13 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Bradandrews4! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Java Hurricane 06:16, 13 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]