User talk:Brianjd/Archive 4

This is an archive of past discussions about User:Brianjd. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.

Archive 1

Archive 2

Archive 3

Archive 4

Archive 5

Fair use image removed from user space

Hi - I've removed a fair use image from this page in your userspace, as per criterion 9 of the non-free content policy, fair use images are not allowed to be used in userspace. Cheers, -Panser Born- (talk) 19:07, 17 May 2007 (UTC)

Wikimania 2008

Hey! I'm contacting all the members of wikiproject Perth because, I have put in an incomplete bid for Perth to hold Wikimania 2008. Please show your support by adding your name to the list and help contribute by improving our bid which is incomplete and located here - thanks Talk to symode09's or How's my driving? 17:44, 10 August 2007 (UTC)

Unfortunately I'm not that interested in Wikimania at the moment - having such a poor Internet connection doesn't help - and by the time I got around to looking at this bid, it had closed. Brian Jason Drake 05:33, 24 January 2008 (UTC)

Idiot code

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Idiot code, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. If you agree with the deletion of the article, and you are the only person who has made substantial edits to the page, please add {{db-author}} to the top of Idiot code. ruinia (talk) 22:26, 22 January 2008 (UTC)

I've removed the {{dated prod}} notice and added {{mergeto}} and {{mergefrom}} notices to Idiot code and Code, respectively. Brian Jason Drake 05:39, 24 January 2008 (UTC)

Merge idiot code?

You placed merge tags, but no discussion. Since I couldn't imagine what you had in mind, there being nothing there to merge, I took out the tags. Dicklyon (talk) 07:27, 24 January 2008 (UTC)

Well, it has now been merged anyway. Brian Jason Drake 05:03, 28 January 2008 (UTC)

Singapore Airlines

I have been editing airline articles in Wikipedia for some time now, and my edits are according to the Wikiproject style. This style of course doesn't have to be used, but when looking at airlines such as American Airlines, Northwest Airlines, Delta Air Lines, Continental Airlines, United Airlines, etc, you will notice not only myself, but other editors have helped me implement a consistent style. Once again, it is soley my opinion on how the airline articles should be layed out. Most Star Alliance airline articles do have the style I utilize, as I have edited many of them some time before. All SkyTeam articles also have this style as well. That is why I try not to edit international airlines too often because the way I edit them is usually not the way many people want them. But, as I have discussed with many editors of this article, it needs serious attention. My edits were reasonable, but I understand that I dont necassarily describe them as much as I should. I really think the edits I made were well overdue.--Golich17 00:30, 2 May 2007 (UTC)

I searched some old revisions of the Singapore Airlines talk page, and found nothing relevant. I searched some old revisions of your talk page and the only relevant item I found was a comment asking you to move sections in one edit and use better edit summaries. In both cases, the lists, which for me contain 200 revisions, go back to 2006. I have no idea what that massive paragraph above is about, except for "I understand that I dont necassarily describe them as much as I should", nor can I understand why this section is called "Singapore Airlines". Brian Jason Drake 05:57, 24 January 2008 (UTC)