Browniemountain, you are invited on a Wikipedia Adventure!
Re: Upsilon Acrux
- Okay. The writeups you were posting definitely went beyond what we typically look for in terms of giving subjective positive acclaim to the article's subject. It's fine if you want to add sections on critical reception of the albums, and sources like Pop Matters and Prefix would be good, but it would be better to pull quotes from the articles or paraphrase neutrally about what the reviews discuss (like influences, similar artists/songs, or technique) rather than more generic talk about rave reviews and the like. Discussion of band history should be coming from reputable media outlets unconnected to the band, like magazines, newspapers, and well-regarded online review sites. Thanks for responding. Chubbles (talk) 01:18, 10 March 2014 (UTC)
Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Tarantula may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 ""s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.
- List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
- to an allergic reaction rather than to the venom. Such allergic effects can be life-threatening [Fuchs J. A verified spider bite and a review of the literature confirm Indian ornamental tree