Jump to content

User talk:BurnItUp15

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Welcome![edit]

Hello, BurnItUp15, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

You may also want to complete the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit the Teahouse to ask questions or seek help. Need some ideas about what kind of things need doing? Try the Task Center.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! Comr Melody Idoghor (talk) 22:42, 7 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Love Sux Tour (February 8)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Ts12rAc was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Ts12rActalk to me 03:29, 8 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Teahouse logo
Hello, BurnItUp15! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Ts12rActalk to me 03:29, 8 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Love Sux Tour (February 8)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Slywriter was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Slywriter (talk) 22:13, 8 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for March 15[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

Apollo
added a link pointing to Aplu
Ares
added a link pointing to Serpent
Demeter
added a link pointing to Carmanor

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:04, 15 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Sources?[edit]

Hello, BurnItUp15. I thought it might help for you to know that with the possible exception of very obvious statements, all material added by editors to any article - or any part of any article, such as infoboxes - must be verifiable. That means it should be supported by reliable, trustworthy published sources, produced by recognised specialists in relevant fields of study. Infoboxes are supposed to function as simple, "at-a-glance" summaries or digests of a subject's essentials. I see you've added a lot of material to the infoboxes of articles on various ancient Greek deities, but haven't provided the sources you used for that information, either in the infoboxes or the text of the articles themselves. Rather than delete what you've added, could you please provide your sources for adding it in the first place? Meanwhile, please don't add any more uncited or unsupported information to articles. Regards, Haploidavey (talk) 16:03, 15 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I've mainly gotten them from Theoi.com, which sources almost every text on Greco-Roman mythology. BurnItUp15 (talk) 16:38, 15 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for the quick response. Unfortunately, (and thorough though it is) Theoi.com is not considered a reliable source for Wikipedia articles. This is partly because it tends to lump Greek and Roman mythology together. It also has no independent editorial oversight. Haploidavey (talk) 16:43, 15 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Another, really crucial aspect is that theoi uses only primary sources, along with some out-of-copyright secondary sources; Wikipedia articles can include primary sources, but secondary sources should be used for critical appraisal of content, and of meaning. Theoi combines ancient texts with cults and myths as if they were the same thing. Which they're not. Its apparently "secondary" sources tend to be enormously outdated. Haploidavey (talk) 16:47, 15 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

March 2022[edit]

Warning icon Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to use disruptive, inappropriate or hard-to-read formatting, as you did at Love On Tour, you may be blocked from editing. There is a Wikipedia Manual of Style, and edits should not deliberately go against it without special reason. livelikemusic (TALK!) 03:30, 25 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Love Sux Tour[edit]

Information icon Hello, BurnItUp15. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Love Sux Tour, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 23:03, 11 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Love Sux Tour[edit]

Hello, BurnItUp15. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Love Sux Tour".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 22:39, 8 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:55, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]