Jump to content

User talk:CZ3699

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Welcome!

Hello, CZ3699, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to ask me on my talk page or place {{Help me}} on this page and someone will drop by to help. Red Director (talk) 19:18, 2 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

CZ3699, you are invited to the Teahouse!

[edit]
Teahouse logo

Hi CZ3699! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like John from Idegon (talk).

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:08, 3 February 2019 (UTC)

March 2019

[edit]
Stop icon

Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Fargo1004 (talk) 03:40, 3 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Fargo1004: I agree that this is getting crazy. Can we talk on here to see how we can settle this peacefully? CZ3699 (talk) 21:18, 3 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Simple, please read and understand WP:NOTEVERYTHING. We do not include excessive information here, just a summary. The table is more than adequate, the timeline was redundant. Stop it. Fargo1004 (talk) 23:20, 4 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
alright then, case closed but please know that the table was not redundat and I have already told you why. CZ3699 (talk) 02:08, 5 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

April 2019

[edit]

Information icon Hello, I'm STATicVapor. Your recent edit to the page Xavier Woods appears to have added incorrect information, so it has been removed for now. If you believe the information was correct, please cite a reliable source or discuss your change on the article's talk page. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. StaticVapor message me! 17:46, 10 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

sorry about that, I was on a tiny device and didn’t realize that the brands were spilt. The current info is indeed right. Once again, sorry! CZ3699 (talk) 19:20, 11 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

September 2019

[edit]

Information icon Please do not add or change content, as you did at IndiGo, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Jetstreamer Talk 12:54, 5 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

[edit]
Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:24, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]