User talk:CZ3699
Hello, CZ3699, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages you might find helpful:
- Introduction
- The five pillars of Wikipedia
- How to edit a page
- How to write a great article
- Simplified Manual of Style
- Your first article
- Discover what's going on in the Wikimedia community
- And feel free to make test edits in the sandbox.
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to ask me on my talk page or place {{Help me}}
on this page and someone will drop by to help. Red Director (talk) 19:18, 2 February 2019 (UTC)
CZ3699, you are invited to the Teahouse!
[edit]Hi CZ3699! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. We hope to see you there!
Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts 16:08, 3 February 2019 (UTC) |
March 2019
[edit]Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.
Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Fargo1004 (talk) 03:40, 3 March 2019 (UTC)
- @Fargo1004: I agree that this is getting crazy. Can we talk on here to see how we can settle this peacefully? CZ3699 (talk) 21:18, 3 March 2019 (UTC)
- Simple, please read and understand WP:NOTEVERYTHING. We do not include excessive information here, just a summary. The table is more than adequate, the timeline was redundant. Stop it. Fargo1004 (talk) 23:20, 4 March 2019 (UTC)
- alright then, case closed but please know that the table was not redundat and I have already told you why. CZ3699 (talk) 02:08, 5 March 2019 (UTC)
April 2019
[edit]Hello, I'm STATicVapor. Your recent edit to the page Xavier Woods appears to have added incorrect information, so it has been removed for now. If you believe the information was correct, please cite a reliable source or discuss your change on the article's talk page. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. StaticVapor message me! 17:46, 10 April 2019 (UTC)
- sorry about that, I was on a tiny device and didn’t realize that the brands were spilt. The current info is indeed right. Once again, sorry! CZ3699 (talk) 19:20, 11 April 2019 (UTC)
September 2019
[edit]Please do not add or change content, as you did at IndiGo, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Jetstreamer Talk 12:54, 5 September 2019 (UTC)