Jump to content

User talk:Caddyman3

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Page Topic Options?

[edit]

Have you considered page topic options for your assignments?Ajungle (talk) 01:25, 11 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Please work on your sources for your topic and add them here. Ajungle (talk) 04:03, 3 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Help us improve the Wikipedia Education Program

[edit]

Hi Caddyman3! As a student editor on Wikipedia, you have a lot of valuable experience about what it's like to edit as a part of a classroom assignment. In order to help other students like you enjoy editing while contributing positively to Wikipedia, it's extremely helpful to hear from real student editors about their challenges, successes, and support needs. Please take a few minutes to answer these questions by clicking below. (Note that the responses are posted to a public wiki page.) Thanks!


Delivered on behalf of User:Sage Ross (WMF), 16:50, 10 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Bona Fide Groups Page

[edit]

Bona Fide Groups is a theoretical perspective of communication in small groups that was initially developed by Linda L. Putnam and Cynthia Stohl in the 1990's. Intended to provide communication theorists with a valid model of small groups on which to conduct research, this perspective focuses on the principles of communication that take place within naturally formed social groups[1]. This represented a shift in traditional research practices which had primarily consisted of studies on zero-history laboratory groups [2].

Putnam and Stohl describe a bona fide group as exhibiting stable yet permeable boundaries, interdependence with the immediate context of individual group members, and links between boundaries and context. These characteristics allow for important elements of small groups, such as fluctuation in group member commitment level and a shared sense of boundaries.

In their call for research to move its focus toward bona fide groups, Putnam and Stohl argued that this model is more ecologically valid than alternative case studies, and as such, it gives a more accurate reading of how small groups behave on a day-to-day basis. Furthermore, since it had already helped develop current research settings, methods, and variables, it most certainly will continue to shape small group communication studies. In the time since this initial argument was proposed, social scientists have generally agreed with Putnam and Stohl, and have redirected much of their research to emphasize bona fide groups as a model of small group communication[3] .


References

[edit]
  1. ^ Putnam, L. L. (1990). "Bona fide groups: A reconceptualization of groups in context". Communication Studies. 41 (3): 248–265. {{cite journal}}: Unknown parameter |coauthors= ignored (|author= suggested) (help)
  2. ^ Kramer, M. W. "Bona fide groups". Blackwell Reference Online. Retrieved 1 May 2013.
  3. ^ Frey, L. R. (2003). Group communication in context: Studies of bona fide groups. Mahwah, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Publishers. ISBN 0805831495.

[1] [2] [3]

Your submission at Articles for creation

[edit]
Bona Fide Groups, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Roger (Dodger67) (talk) 17:19, 2 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The article Bona Fide Groups has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

no evidence this is a genuine theory used by other people, not just a coincidence of words

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. DGG ( talk ) 04:38, 25 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

  1. ^ Putnam, L. L. (1990). "Bona fide groups: A reconceptualization of groups in context". Communication Studies. 41 (3): 248–265. {{cite journal}}: Unknown parameter |coauthors= ignored (|author= suggested) (help)
  2. ^ Kramer, M. W. "Bona fide groups". Blackwell Reference Online. Retrieved 1 May 2013.
  3. ^ Frey, L. R. (2003). Group communication in context: Studies of bona fide groups. Mahwah, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Publishers. ISBN 0805831495.