User talk:Cairue

January 2020

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Rana el Kaliouby has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
For help, take a look at the introduction.
The following is the log entry regarding this message: Rana el Kaliouby was changed by Cairue (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.991092 on 2020-01-06T10:33:04+00:00

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 10:33, 6 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Rana el Kaliouby

Hi Rula! It's Silas in Cambridge, Rana and I did our PhDs in the same office :) Sorry to see you got reverted when you tried to improve her article. I think the editors who reverted you didn't know who you are and also didn't know you had permission to use that picture (Wikipedia is very cautious about copyright). Also one of the edits was reverted by a robot, the robot is designed to automatically detect "vandalism" but sometimes it can false-positive. On its revert it added a link to report false positives, which we should certainly do in this case because what you are doing is most definitely not vandalism (even if some other human editors think you missed a rule in Wikipedia's policy, it still shouldn't count as "vandalism" for that robot which is designed to detect mindless messing-up of articles so it definitely false-positive'd on your edit). Sorry I have to rush now, but just wanted to let you know I'm here, I'm watching, and I'll help later if others don't help first :) Meanwhile, would you be able to look into the possibility of getting a nice picture of Rana which you and she can definitively give Wikipedia permission to use under its preferred free license, and upload that to Commons along with clear licensing information? That should stop everyone worrying about the copyright on the image use :) Thanks. Silas S. Brown (email, talk) 09:10, 7 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

July 2021 block

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for advertising or self-promoting in violation of the conflict of interest and notability guidelines.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. MER-C 15:48, 24 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Cairue (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

please note that we have created a page on a public profile of a CEO - Hazem Metwally, CEO of Etisalat - the leading telecom operator in Egypt

Decline reason:

I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
the block is no longer necessary because you
1. understand what you have been blocked for,
2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. Yamla (talk) 10:55, 25 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Please explain the reason for this block

@MER-C: I don't understand the reason for this block, so I'm not sure how Rula is supposed to understand it. As I see it, Rula identified herself on the Rana el Kaliouby talk page in January 2020, I replied there with a reminder about Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy, secondary sources and licensing (for the image), I also said hello on this talk page in case she wasn't reading that one. Perhaps I should have mentioned other policies, but anyway Rula complied with what I'd said and has not edited the article at all since last year. In that time, I have reviewed the article and I assume other editors have done so too. Why is it suddenly necessary now to block Rula indefinitely and tag the Rana El-Kaliouby page as spam when the activity was last year and the page has been reviewed since? Has Rula done something else of which I am not aware? Please can we assume good faith: if she only wanted to help her sister, she didn't realise she'd broken policy, and she stopped, why exactly is a block needed now? Thanks. Silas S. Brown (email, talk) 18:52, 26 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
- They're blocked for suspected undeclared paid editing and covert advertising on Draft:Hazem Metwally. UPE on one page makes all similar pages suspect. I'd want to know how File:Hazem Metwally .png is this editor's own work. MER-C 19:02, 26 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Hazem Metwally

Hello, Cairue. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Hazem Metwally".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 20:46, 24 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]