User talk:Captain Nemesis
January 2022
[edit]
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Chicken or the egg have been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.
- ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
- For help, take a look at the introduction.
- The following is the log entry regarding this message: Chicken or the egg was changed by Captain Nemesis (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.983012 on 2022-01-24T09:16:47+00:00
Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 09:16, 24 January 2022 (UTC)
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Chicken or the egg. Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Megan B.... It’s all coming to me till the end of time 09:30, 24 January 2022 (UTC)
You wrongly accused me of vandalism. Shame on you! I had best intentions. I am ready to defend my answer in open debate.
Please refrain from wrong accusations! You are defending the article which is not true by accusing me of something I didn`t do without even reading my correct answer to the question "egg or chicken - which came first".
It was the egg
[edit]Because what laid it wasn't quite a chicken... Adakiko (talk) 09:31, 24 January 2022 (UTC)
It wasn`t quite a chicken, but you are sure that it was quite an egg? Not quite a chicken laid a chicken egg. Bravo!
I know it was vandalism,but it was hilarious! Here, have a cookie🍪
ExoplanetaryNova has given you a cookie! Cookies promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. You can spread the WikiLove by giving someone else a cookie, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend.
To spread the goodness of cookies, you can add {{subst:Cookie}} to someone's talk page with a friendly message, or eat this cookie on the giver's talk page with {{subst:munch}}!
ExoplanetaryNova (talk) 23:13, 27 January 2022 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of User:Captain Nemesis/sandbox
[edit]
Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, introducing inappropriate pages, such as User:Captain Nemesis/sandbox, is considered vandalism and is prohibited. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Under section G3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, the page has been nominated for deletion.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. RoanokeVirginia (talk) 20:02, 9 March 2022 (UTC)
1) My answer is RIGHT. 2) Your answer is WRONG! 3) You have insulted me and I am soon filling a lawsuit against you. WHO ARE YOU CALLING A VANDAL? ME? How dare you insult me? My intentions were nothing but sincere. Goodbye and see you in the court room after I fill my lawsuit for the atrocity you made.
You throw insults very easy at people who wanted to help. At the same time you, Wikipedia, warn me about my alleged misbehaviour.
I WILL PROVE IN THE COURT OF LAW THAT YOU HAVE INSULTED ME WITHOUT ANY JUSTIFIABLE REASON OTHER THAN VANITY.
You violate the communication rules.
"If I ask you what is your name?" my question, like all rational questions, automatically include the very specific frame of the reference. There is a science called linguistics. Check it out before you proclaim NOBLE MEN, like me, to be a vandal. You even propose "speedy deletion"? See you in the court of law for all this insults.
Are you going to answer to me anything else than saying your name? You will not. But that is exactly what you did and do with the question "Chicken or egg". That question also have very specific frame of reference constituting of JUST two terms onen being "Chicken" and the second "Egg".
If someone asks "Chicken or egg?" there is no mention of the prehistoric eggs or anything else other than two mentioned.
The question "Chicken or egg" has very specific, precisely determined frame of reference.
YOU REFUSE TO ACCEPT MY CORRECT ANSWER.
Do what you like. I do not care.
Do you know why don`t I care? Because TRUTH needs no advocates. THE TRUTH SPEAKS FOR ITSELF!
Your Wikipedia article about "chicken-egg" question is WRONG!
Have a nice day, Wikipedia. You now probably think that I asked you what time is it? I didn`t.
February 2023
[edit]
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. DanCherek (talk) 02:23, 13 February 2023 (UTC)