User talk:Captaincold

An editor has expressed a concern that this account may be a sockpuppet of Creatureking (talk · contribs · logs).
Please refer to editing habits or contributions of the sockpuppet for evidence. This policy subsection may be helpful.

Account information: block log – contribs – logs – abuse log – CentralAuth

Welcome!

Hello, Captaincold, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, like Thunder Cleese, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines for page creation, and may soon be deleted.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} on this page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! — X S G 04:27, 26 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Thunder Cleese

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Thunder Cleese, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process because of the following concern:

Subject doesn't warrant its own page, nor is it notable enough to warrant a redirect.

All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. — X S G 04:27, 26 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Brak's Mom

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Brak's Mom, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process because of the following concern:

Minor fictional character. WP:N

All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Wperdue (talk) 23:51, 27 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Thunder Cleese

A tag has been placed on Thunder Cleese requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an article with no content whatsoever, or whose contents consist only of external links, "See also" section, book reference, category tag, template tag, interwiki link, rephrasing of the title, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Patchy1Talk To Me! 01:39, 28 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Thunder Cleese

A tag has been placed on Thunder Cleese, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion debate, such as at articles for deletion. Under the specified criteria, where an article has substantially identical content to that of an article deleted after debate, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. — X S G 02:43, 28 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please note that my attempt to redirect to The Brak Show was a compromise, and against my better judgment in the first place. That you undid that redirect leads me to the conclusion that you're not trying to be constructive, here, and therefore I've recommended to the deleting admin that Thunder Cleese be protected against re-creation, as well. You lose. — X S G 02:50, 28 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Articles for deletion nomination of Sisto

I have nominated Sisto, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sisto. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. — X S G 02:55, 28 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Brak's Dad

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Brak's Dad, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process because of the following concern:

Minor character doesn't meet WP:N.

All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. — X S G 02:57, 28 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Articles for deletion nomination of Creature King

I have nominated Creature King, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Creature King. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. — X S G 02:59, 28 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Articles for deletion nomination of Tansuit

I have nominated Tansuit, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tansuit. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. — X S G 03:00, 28 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Don Kennedy

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Don Kennedy, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process because of the following concern:

No reliable sources found to verify notability.

All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. — X S G 03:01, 28 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Council of Doom

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Council of Doom, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process because of the following concern:

Minor fictional characters which don't meet WP:N.

All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. — X S G 03:05, 28 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Space Ghost/Brak Show Characters

Please stop creating or re-creating pages for the characters of the Space Ghost and Brak Shows. The shows have a section on their characters and this is sufficient in Wikipedia for these characters. Please make constructive edits to these sections rather than creating a bunch of character articles which will ultimately be removed from Wikipedia. — X S G 03:08, 28 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Brak's Dad

A tag has been placed on Brak's Dad requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about about a person, organization (band, club, company, etc.) or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Jared555 (talk) 21:12, 28 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

June 2009

Please stop. If you continue removing Articles for deletion notices or comments from articles and Articles for deletion pages, as you did with Brak's Dad, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Jared555 (talk) 21:15, 28 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

This is your last warning. You will be blocked from editing the next time you vandalize a page, as you did with this edit to Fantastic Four (1978 TV series). Alansohn (talk) 02:21, 29 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Don Kennedy

A tag has been placed on Don Kennedy requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. — X S G 00:31, 11 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Articles for deletion nomination of Don Kennedy

I have nominated Don Kennedy, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Don Kennedy (2nd nomination). Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. — X S G 00:33, 11 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Articles for deletion nomination of Council of Doom

I have nominated Council of Doom, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Council of Doom. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. — X S G 01:09, 11 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

RfD nomination of Brak's Dad

Articles for deletion nomination of Tansuit

I have nominated Tansuit, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tansuit (2nd nomination). Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. — X S G 01:16, 11 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Articles for deletion nomination of Lokar

I have nominated Lokar, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lokar. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. — X S G 01:18, 11 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Recreation of deleted material

Please do not recreate material (or undo redirects) that have been deemed inappropriate/not notable by community consensus. Doing so is considered disruptive editing and can lead to being blocked. Please stop. If you have any questions, feel free to contact me on my talk page. --ThaddeusB (talk) 01:43, 13 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

July 2009

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to the page The Lizard King (Spider-man episode has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. Impala2009 | Talk 01:40, 16 July 2009 (UTC) This is a misunderstanding. Please ignore this warning. Thank you. -- Blanchardb -^{Me•MyEars•MyMouth}- timed 14:06, 16 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of The Lizard King (Spider-man episode)

A tag has been placed on The Lizard King (Spider-man episode) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. — X S G 05:31, 16 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of The Lizard King (Spider-man episode)

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article The Lizard King (Spider-man episode), suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process because of the following concern:

Episodes of Spider-man don't warrant Wikipedia articles of their own.

All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. — X S G 05:36, 16 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of The Wedding (Spider-man episode)

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article The Wedding (Spider-man episode), suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process because of the following concern:

Spider-man episodes don't warrant Wikipedia articles of their own.

All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. — X S G 05:38, 16 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop creating these. You've been advised as to the notability guidelines; individual episodes are not eligible for their own articles. PMDrive1061 (talk) 03:05, 18 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from introducing inappropriate pages to Wikipedia. Doing so is not in accordance with our policies. For more information about creating articles, you may want to read Wikipedia:Your first article. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. I have redirected the episode pages you've created from the 1994 Spider-Man series back to the core article. Please do not continue to create individual pages for the episodes without discussing them in the source article. The episodes are not notable enough to warrant their own Wikipedia articles. mhking (talk) 04:35, 18 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Alexander Knox (Batman)

The article Alexander Knox (Batman) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Minor fictional character. No assertion of significance.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the Proposed Deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The Speedy Deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and Articles for Deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Blanchardb -^{Me•MyEars•MyMouth}- timed 02:11, 24 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hello again. Once more: PLEASE review WP:YFA and WP:NOTABILITY. Please further keep in mind that (a) this is not a random collection of facts and that (b) this is a community. Feel free to respond on this page if you have any concerns. PMDrive1061 (talk) 02:13, 24 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for repeated abuse of editing privileges. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest this block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here}} below, but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first.

You are being blocked for repeated questionable edits and for sockpuppetry. --PMDrive1061 (talk) 00:37, 14 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]