User talk:Carcharias1

This is Carcharias1's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

AfC notification: Draft:Endoplasmic Reticulum Membrane Protein Complex (EMC) has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Endoplasmic Reticulum Membrane Protein Complex (EMC). Thanks! Robert McClenon (talk) 18:27, 26 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Endoplasmic Reticulum Membrane Protein Complex (EMC) has been accepted

Endoplasmic Reticulum Membrane Protein Complex (EMC), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

SwisterTwister talk 04:23, 27 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

User:Carcharias1 - Does the LUCA in the article really refer to the hypothetical very ancient Last Universal Common Ancestor of all life, including eukaryotes, bacteria, and archaea, or to the slightly less ancient but still very ancient hypothetical Last Universal Common Ancestor of eukaryotes (thought to have been the result of a strange symbiosis between free-living mitochondria and free-living something else)? If, as I inferred, it is the latter, maybe a clarification somewhere is in order. Robert McClenon (talk) 21:10, 27 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:RNF145

Hello, Carcharias1. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "RNF145".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Dolotta (talk) 01:35, 8 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

July 2023

Hi Carcharias1! I noticed that you have reverted to restore your preferred version of an article several times. The impulse to undo an edit you disagree with is understandable, but I wanted to make sure you're aware that the edit warring policy disallows repeated reversions even if they are justifiable.

All editors are expected to discuss content disputes on article talk pages to try to reach consensus. If you are unable to agree, please use one of the dispute resolution options to seek input from others. Using this approach instead of reverting can help you avoid getting drawn into an edit war. Thank you. Nikkimaria (talk) 15:36, 30 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Nikkimaria - thank you for pointing this out. No problem. I am happy to discuss anz modifications to the edits I made and if you think it is an unbalanced description, I am sure we can find a mutually agreeable solution. However, I consider it unwarranted to revert all changes I made without explanantion as to what parts are unsuitable or "biased". Happy to discuss - I am sure we can improve this article together. Have a nice day! :) Carcharias1 (talk) 05:49, 2 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Unfortunately my objections are to pretty much all of it. The article in question is a featured article, which means that it is required to meet some specific standards regarding things like sourcing and phrasing. I suggest centralizing this discussion at Talk:Brown_Dog_affair to allow others to weigh in and see if we can arrive at a consensus, but until that happens this should stay out. Nikkimaria (talk) 23:09, 2 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]