User talk:Carlytuan

Speedy deletion nomination of EaseUS Todo Backup

Hello Carlytuan,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged EaseUS Todo Backup for deletion, because the article doesn't clearly indicate why the subject is important enough to be included in an encyclopedia.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Thanks!

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

echidnaLives - talk - edits 09:57, 9 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of EaseUS Todo Backup

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on EaseUS Todo Backup, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 14:19, 10 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reply

Hi, Onel5969 pinged me regarding the deletion of your article. He has given you some good advice, but please read the following.

If you have as conflict of interest, you must declare it, particularly if you work directly or indirectly for an organisation, or otherwise are acting on its behalf. Also read the following regarding writing an article:

you must provide independent verifiable sources to enable us to verify the facts and show that it meets the notability guidelines. Sources that are not acceptable include those linked to the organisation or company, press releases, YouTube, IMDB, social media and other sites that can be self-edited, logs, websites of unknown or non-reliable provenance, and sites that are just reporting what the company or organisation claims or interviewing its management. Note that references should be in-line so we can tell what fact each is supporting, and should not be bare urls
You must write in a non-promotional tone. Articles must be neutral and encyclopaedic, with verifiable facts, not opinions or reviews.
There shouldn't be any url links in the article, only in the "References" or "External links" sections.
You must not copy text from elsewhere. Copyrighted text is not allowed in Wikipedia, as outlined in this policy. That applies even to pages created by you or your organisation, unless they state clearly and explicitly that the text is public domain. We require that text posted here can be used, modified and distributed for any purpose, including commercial; text is considered to be copyright unless explicitly stated otherwise. There are ways to donate copyrighted text to Wikipedia, as described here; please note that simply asserting on the talk page that you are the owner of the copyright, or you have permission to use the text, isn't sufficient.

Your references appear mostly to be reviews or "how to"s, rather than sources that illustrate how it meets the notability criteria for software I've linked above. Whether reviewers think it's wonderful or rubbish isn't a criterion for notability. Similarly, your text simply tells us what is does, with absolute nothing to suggest the wider significance required for software to be notable. Whether or not it was your intention, text that just describes what a product does, with no wider context, is bound to look promotional.

Before attempting to write an article again, please make sure that the topic meets the notability criteria linked above, and check that you can find independent third party sources. Also read Your first article. You must also reply to the COI request above.

If you wish to proceed, let me know on my talk page, or ping me from here, and I'll restore as a draft Jimfbleak - talk to me? 11:51, 17 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Jimfbleak,

I appreciate your help. I have read the good advice and reference pages provided by Onel5969. I request to be able to edit the article again and hope to get your approval. Carlytuan (talk) 07:05, 24 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Jimfbleak I have no conflict of interest with the article I created. I'm not either working for EaseUS Todo Backup or paid/employed to create the page. Carlytuan (talk) 07:45, 7 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: EaseUS Todo Backup (January 31)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Stuartyeates was:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

in-depth (not just passing mentions about the subject)
reliable
secondary
independent of the subject

Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Most of these are passing mentions or primary sources.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:EaseUS Todo Backup and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Stuartyeates (talk) 03:39, 31 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Carlytuan! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Stuartyeates (talk) 03:39, 31 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, @Stuartyeates. I found several articles that met the Wikipedia citation requirements, and each citation contained detailed information about the software in question. Wait them be checked by other editors.

However when I made edits to other software topics, I find that some of these topics are marked as advertisements or do not meet the citation requirements, yet they have been approved and published. And for some articles, I found there are citations that can't meet the requirements you shared.

I really tried the best to find the reference info for Draft:EaseUS Todo Backup, if it's found not enough, hope anybody else can add more. Carlytuan (talk) 08:42, 17 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: EaseUS Todo Backup (June 17)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Carpimaps was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

The comment the reviewer left was:

This subject is definitely notable. However, bulk of the content is unsourced and only contains trivial information. Please only list what relible sources say about the subject and do not perform original research. See WP:NOTGUIDE.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:EaseUS Todo Backup and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Carpimaps ^{talk to me!} 14:16, 17 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:EaseUS Todo Backup

Hello, Carlytuan. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:EaseUS Todo Backup, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 15:06, 17 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]